Saturday, June 30, 2012

"Obamacare now invalid because tax bills must originate in House"

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

Reader, link: "Obamacare now invalid because tax bills must originate in House"
Posted By: hobie [Send E-Mail]
Date: Saturday, 30-Jun-2012 15:32:06

(Thanks, K. :)
Reader KG sends us:
***************************************************************************
Obamacare now invalid because tax bills must originate in House
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) may now be invalid because the Supreme Court ruled that it relies on a tax for implementation.
According to the United States Constitution, all tax bills must originate in the House of Representatives. This law originated in the Senate, because at the time the Democrats were selling it as a purchase - not a tax. Since the Supreme Court has ruled that the law is indeed based on a tax increase, it would have had to be initiated as a bill in the House of Representatives.
Consequently, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Law is unconstitutional on a different criteria than the ones considered by the Supreme Court in this latest landmark decision. By calling the individual mandate unconstitutional but allowing the law as a federal program to be funded by new taxes, Justice Roberts essentially nullified the law.
http://www.examiner.com/article/obamacare-now-invalid-because-tax-bills-must-originate-house?fb_action_ids=10151609024629068&fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_source=other_multiline

2 comments:

Dan said...

It does NOT matter where it originated by the Constitution of THE UNITED STATES, INC. as the Constitution of the united States of America was thrown out in 1871.
Since we have been under Martial Law since Lincoln declared it in 1863 the President is a DICTATOR no matter what!

Anonymous said...

Yes, that DOES appear to be an undercut in logic, the fact that the POTUS has always been a dictator since Lincoln's time and can do whatever he can get away with. But how about asking the first two of the Three Magic Questions first? What is the EXACT AMOUNT of fraud that ANYBODY has the right to commit? What is the EXACT AMOUNT of fraud that ANYBODY has an actual obligation to endure? THEN ask the third one, "What is the BASIC PREMISE that is being operated off of in the instant case?
It will be easier to understand the TMQs if you get acquainted with the definition of fraud in a law dictionary. And then look up the word contract and become as familiar with it as you are your own name.

Randy