SENT USING THE LATEST VERSION OF THE TOR BROWSER
August 10 2014
Ebola deaths have now reached
1,000 which in my opinion makes it a real outbreak, and fits perfectly with the
previously calculated expansion rate of 1.83 monthly
UPDATE AND CORRECTION: Shortest range variant of Israeli ABM system is only
able to track incoming missiles SCUD AND UP launched from over 300 KM away,
Iron dome in relation to tiny Hamas rockets is a HOAX
And now back to Press TV taking a nose dive
Even completely Jewish sources which are fully zionist claim Hamas
rockets have a max range of 12.75 miles when made by Russia (so those are
rare) where the heck did PressTV get 160 Kilometers from? I KNOW, THEY GOT IT
FROM YESTERDAY'S REPORT ON THIS WEB SITE ABOUT IRON DOME, WHICH PEGGED IRON
DOME'S MINIMUM EFFECTIVE THEATER AT 150 KM! SO MIRACULOUSLY, HAMAS GOT 10X THE
RANGE OVERNIGHT.
And now I am going to PEG PressTV for allowing Gordon Duff on board, this
is long overdue because Duff has gone out of his way to slander this site and
it is time to hit back, read it and weep
Gordon Duff of Veteran's Today posts ridiculously impossible and
technically flawed report about "micro nukes"
First, an excerpt from the
report,
Such weapons have existed for over 20 years, multiples of which were deployed on “ground zero” on 9/11 and have been used repeatedly as “very large conventional munitions” in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Radiation is only 3% of that of a normal weapon, undetectable by Geiger counter, unable to penetrate skin, with a half-life of under 48 hours but fatal if irradiated materials are ingested.
Temperatures reach over 1 million degrees Fahrenheit and structural steel, concrete, human bodies or anything within 1-300 yards of “ground zero” is vaporized.
What goes on inside the coke can is described thusly: Abstract
A consistent conventional theoretical description is presented for anomalous low energy deuterium nuclear fusion in micro/nano-scale metal grains and particles.
The theory is based on the Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) state occupied by deuterons trapped in a micro/nano-scale metal grain or particle. The theory is capable of explaining most of the experimentally observed results and also provides theoretical predictions. Experimental tests of theoretical predictions are proposed. Scalabilities of the observed effects are discussed based on theoretical predictions."
My comment: Sounds great, . . . . . . .now let me shred this
These are the nuclear materials he claims are used:
"a small amount of uranium or plutonium, no larger than a coin, a supply of deuterium, tritium"
He states the weapons design uses URANIUM or PLUTONIUM, yet claims the materials have a 48 hour half life. Yet reality puts the half life of even the most radiologically active form of uranium at tens of thousands of years which is a LOT longer than the 48 hours he claims. Tritium has a half life of years, thus making his "half-life of under 48 hours" a technical impossibility.
When he states : "Radiation is only 3% of that of a normal weapon, undetectable by Geiger counter, unable to penetrate skin, but fatal if irradiated materials are ingested" he is giving a description of Beta and Alpha radiation which are unsuitable for any type of weapons type nuclear reaction, and is proven double flatulent by the fact that both Uranium AND Plutonium produce ionizing radiation, which is detectable by the cheapest out of calibration Geiger counter, and he POUNDS the error home by following up with the statement it's only dangerous if ingested, which definitively pegs him as saying Uranium and Plutonium do not emit ionizing radiation; they are beta and alpha only; ya know. And he can't back out and say "depleted Uranium" which is a beta and alpha emitter because he states "plutonium" which has no non-ionizing form;
He then goes on to state : "Temperatures reach over 1 million degrees Fahrenheit and structural steel, concrete, human bodies or anything within 1-300 yards of “ground zero” is vaporized."
Why is this BS? BECAUSE he quotes it is all made possible by the "Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) state occupied by deuterons trapped in a micro/nano-scale metal grain or particle" which is COLD FUSION FOLKS, AND COLD FUSION CANNOT VAPORIZE AS MUCH AS A TEST TUBE.
Additionally,
And now, Let's take a look at his key quote again, which actually quotes
cold fusion:
Now THAT sounds REALLY COOL, does it not? Want to know where that statement came from? Fleischmann and Pons, with their COLD FUSION!!!! It sounds cool, but does not apply to Nukes AT ALL!!!
When I confronted Gordon Duff with this patent B.S. of his after he
had already put out that I am a psy op, he defended it, saying he quoted only
peer reviewed works, and that his Bose Einstein Condensate was backed up by
work from "Sandia Labs"
It almost makes me wonder if he
laughed his way through it, the report is wrong on every single point, the half
lifes, the minimum weapon size, the type of radiation, the actual process,
EVERY SINGLE POINT. Either Duff got stuffed with disinfo and was too uneducated
to see it or he is laughing at us, HOW DID PRESSTV OVER LOOK THIS? ARE THEY
STUPID TOO? A report that bad will destroy a career, HOW DID DUFF SURVIVE?
August 10 2014
Ebola deaths have now reached
1,000 which in my opinion makes it a real outbreak, and fits perfectly with the
previously calculated expansion rate of 1.83 monthly
UPDATE AND CORRECTION: Shortest range variant of Israeli ABM system is only
able to track incoming missiles SCUD AND UP launched from over 300 KM away,
Iron dome in relation to tiny Hamas rockets is a HOAX
In
response to an irresponsible report by PressTV regarding the range of Hamas
rockets "now able to target Haifa" which is PATENT B.S.,
I actually got the real stats on Israeli missile defense rather than going on
memory and as it turns out, the distance the shortest range system needs to
respond to incoming missiles is twice as far as I thought. Israel's smallest
shortest range near theater ABM system is designed to take out Scud missiles And
nothing less, and intercept them at a height of 30 miles, (45 Kilometers). All other Israeli ABM
systems are designed to destroy nuclear warheads in outer space. This is so
spectacularly and ridiculously beyond any "hamas rocket" that it once
again proves the entire Iron dome show is a HOAX, it is all fireworks folks,
that is all there is to it and even an Israeli military analyst has come right out and said it.
And now back to Press TV taking a nose dive
Today,
PressTV published an article where an "Iranian military commander"
claimed Hamas could target Haifa. And that lie is horrific beyond belief,
because it provides full justification for Israel to level Gaza. What does
PressTV really want by stating this anyway? Is Iran the new zio front?
Even completely Jewish sources which are fully zionist claim Hamas
rockets have a max range of 12.75 miles when made by Russia (so those are
rare) where the heck did PressTV get 160 Kilometers from? I KNOW, THEY GOT IT
FROM YESTERDAY'S REPORT ON THIS WEB SITE ABOUT IRON DOME, WHICH PEGGED IRON
DOME'S MINIMUM EFFECTIVE THEATER AT 150 KM! SO MIRACULOUSLY, HAMAS GOT 10X THE
RANGE OVERNIGHT.
Not
to worry, PressTV forced me to double check and OH, IRON DOME'S MINIMUM
EFFECTIVE THEATER IS 300KM, TWICE WHAT I THOUGHT.
Dear Press TV,
you had better clean out your closets and check the basement, an enemy or two
is on your staff. DO YOU KNOW WHAT A PSY OP IS? DO YOU SUCK UP TO AND FALL
FOR EVEN THE LUDICROUS that has been debunked by even your enemies when what
you publish would help them? ISRAEL IS CALLING BUNK ON TARGETING HAIFA, AND
EVEN ANYTHING OVER 10 PERCENT OF THAT. If the rockets justify leveling Gaza,
WHY would Israel call BUNK? Perhaps because Russia, Spain, France and others
know better but PressTV thinks the alternative media is STUPID? Did the NSA
hijack the Iranian press or what?
And now I am going to PEG PressTV for allowing Gordon Duff on board, this
is long overdue because Duff has gone out of his way to slander this site and
it is time to hit back, read it and weep
Gordon Duff of Veteran's Today posts ridiculously impossible and
technically flawed report about "micro nukes"
Keep
in mind that Gordon Duff actually published this as an "Intel
disclosure"!!!
First, an excerpt from the
report,
"According to government nuclear weapons designers,
this is the size of a typical thermonuclear weapon available after 1991, shown
in representative size only as a popular consumer soft drink:
This,
according to government scientists is the current size of a thermonuclear
device, a hydrogen bomb, containing a small amount of uranium or plutonium, no
larger than a coin, a supply of deuterium, tritium and a highly classified
“nano-laser,” probably chemically fired to replace the otherwise required
fission reaction.Such weapons have existed for over 20 years, multiples of which were deployed on “ground zero” on 9/11 and have been used repeatedly as “very large conventional munitions” in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Radiation is only 3% of that of a normal weapon, undetectable by Geiger counter, unable to penetrate skin, with a half-life of under 48 hours but fatal if irradiated materials are ingested.
Temperatures reach over 1 million degrees Fahrenheit and structural steel, concrete, human bodies or anything within 1-300 yards of “ground zero” is vaporized.
What goes on inside the coke can is described thusly: Abstract
A consistent conventional theoretical description is presented for anomalous low energy deuterium nuclear fusion in micro/nano-scale metal grains and particles.
The theory is based on the Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) state occupied by deuterons trapped in a micro/nano-scale metal grain or particle. The theory is capable of explaining most of the experimentally observed results and also provides theoretical predictions. Experimental tests of theoretical predictions are proposed. Scalabilities of the observed effects are discussed based on theoretical predictions."
My comment: Sounds great, . . . . . . .now let me shred this
These are the nuclear materials he claims are used:
"a small amount of uranium or plutonium, no larger than a coin, a supply of deuterium, tritium"
He states the weapons design uses URANIUM or PLUTONIUM, yet claims the materials have a 48 hour half life. Yet reality puts the half life of even the most radiologically active form of uranium at tens of thousands of years which is a LOT longer than the 48 hours he claims. Tritium has a half life of years, thus making his "half-life of under 48 hours" a technical impossibility.
When he states : "Radiation is only 3% of that of a normal weapon, undetectable by Geiger counter, unable to penetrate skin, but fatal if irradiated materials are ingested" he is giving a description of Beta and Alpha radiation which are unsuitable for any type of weapons type nuclear reaction, and is proven double flatulent by the fact that both Uranium AND Plutonium produce ionizing radiation, which is detectable by the cheapest out of calibration Geiger counter, and he POUNDS the error home by following up with the statement it's only dangerous if ingested, which definitively pegs him as saying Uranium and Plutonium do not emit ionizing radiation; they are beta and alpha only; ya know. And he can't back out and say "depleted Uranium" which is a beta and alpha emitter because he states "plutonium" which has no non-ionizing form;
He then goes on to state : "Temperatures reach over 1 million degrees Fahrenheit and structural steel, concrete, human bodies or anything within 1-300 yards of “ground zero” is vaporized."
Why is this BS? BECAUSE he quotes it is all made possible by the "Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) state occupied by deuterons trapped in a micro/nano-scale metal grain or particle" which is COLD FUSION FOLKS, AND COLD FUSION CANNOT VAPORIZE AS MUCH AS A TEST TUBE.
Additionally,
A
48 hour half life means half the total thermal potential of the nuclear
material (as well as radiological potential) is gone in under 48 hours.
Structural steel vaporized at up to 300 yards? That's a lot of heat potential,
and to have HALF of that get released within a device the size of a coke can in
only 48 hours means that it will melt itself almost instantly. Forget
everything else, decay heat makes a coke can size device with such a short half
life material IMPOSSIBLE.
"Radiation
is only 3% of a normal weapon, undetectable by geiger counter" is pure BS,
with a half life of only 48 hours radiation will be EXTREME, and it has to be
ionizing radiation (which is easy to detect) or it won't trigger a nuclear
weapons style chain reaction.
And now, Let's take a look at his key quote again, which actually quotes
cold fusion:
Gordon
stated:
"The
theory is based on the Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) state occupied by
deuterons trapped in a micro/nano-scale metal grain or particle. The theory is
capable of explaining most of the experimentally observed results and also
provides theoretical predictions. Experimental tests of theoretical predictions
are proposed. Scalabilities of the observed effects are discussed based on
theoretical predictions."Now THAT sounds REALLY COOL, does it not? Want to know where that statement came from? Fleischmann and Pons, with their COLD FUSION!!!! It sounds cool, but does not apply to Nukes AT ALL!!!
When I confronted Gordon Duff with this patent B.S. of his after he
had already put out that I am a psy op, he defended it, saying he quoted only
peer reviewed works, and that his Bose Einstein Condensate was backed up by
work from "Sandia Labs"
But
Gordon is so far out there that he does not even know that the paper originated
from Fleischman and Pons in Utah and was
re-pulblished at Sandia Labs in 1989, which later called bunk on it.
Sandia labs subsequently kept working on cold fusion and has since
deemed it viable but in relation to the paper Gordon quoted, it would not be,
and either way you cut it, COLD FUSION IS NOT HOT FUSION WHICH A NUKE TAKES TO
AN EXTREME, Duff stuffed the toilet bowl with so much "micro nuke"
flatulence it is time to rip the pipes out, the situation cannot be recovered.
It almost makes me wonder if he
laughed his way through it, the report is wrong on every single point, the half
lifes, the minimum weapon size, the type of radiation, the actual process,
EVERY SINGLE POINT. Either Duff got stuffed with disinfo and was too uneducated
to see it or he is laughing at us, HOW DID PRESSTV OVER LOOK THIS? ARE THEY
STUPID TOO? A report that bad will destroy a career, HOW DID DUFF SURVIVE?
The
errors are so extreme they make me wonder if this is a clandestine attempt to
undermine the 911 truth movement, in fact all truth including the Fukushima
report, where I state that a large device had to be used to conceal the decay
heat. You can't EVER put a nuke in a coke can no matter WHAT the form; the size
limits are more on the order of a coffee can. Veterans Today has an enormous
readership that posts everywhere thus making Duff's report PURE DAMAGE to
truth.
Gordon,
if you do not know when a topic is over your head, GET OUT of the business.
No comments:
Post a Comment