Thursday, December 11, 2014

The state of Illinois has just quietly passed a new law that criminalizes citizen journalism, making it a felony crime.

The state of Illinois has just quietly passed a new law that criminalizes citizen journalism, making it a felony crime.
Any citizen video recording police can now be arrested and thrown in prison, even if those police are choking someone to death!

America is now rapidly descending into "Hunger Games" style tyranny:
http://www.naturalnews.com/047944_government_tyranny_recording_police_Illinois_law.html

8 comments:

Dan said...

Other stories and comments; “It’s Now Illegal In Illinois To Film Cops”
<a href="http://www.nesaranetwork.com/2014/12/10/its-now-illegal-in-illinois-to-film-cops/”>http://www.nesaranetwork.com/2014/12/10/its-now-illegal-in-illinois-to-film-cops/</a>
Maybe the word has to get out that Politicians are Government Officials as the Legislators and even the Governor are Government Officials!
Therefore, they CAN NOT be Filmed for their Campaign or ANY TIME while In office!
They MUST Remove the Cameras in the Government Buildings and ALL news papers MUST be Banned for making Stories about them as they were even recorded in Writing!
ALL Security Cameras where Police will be at will be Illegal!
Therefore, Evidence for Crimes Committed Will be a Felony!
Cameras on Police Vehicles will be Illegal!
You start bringing around one thing after another then it will be Illegal to NOT be a Government Official, as otherwise you would be sitting in jail!
Did you know that carrying a Cell Phone will be a Felony as many have cameras in them and are a Felony, just as dangerous as a Gun!
The Mafia was doing it old fashion, but now the Police are doing it by Law!

Anonymous said...

They did not pass a law. A city, county, state, federal government has no authority to pass any law as long as they are corporate fictions. Corporations do not make law and all cities, county's, states, the US federal government and all of its agency's are corporations, without authority to make law. Does Microsoft have authority to make law? So there is no legitimate law in America; there is only color of law, which is an abrogation of law. It is all copyrighted, statutes, rules, regulations, bullshit. None of it applies to "we the people" because corporations have no authority to make law, period. So when these corporate fictions say that they made a law you can take it and flush it down the toilet because it's all just bullshit.

Anonymous said...

And your point is?
It says any citizen.
People 'agree' to be citizens.
A govt can do everything in it's power to try to get you to NOT be one, and you sit and remain one no matter what they say they will do to you for being a member of their organization!

You came here after their organization was created, and you say you are a member of it, and they try with all their might, they even put in an incompetent president and congress and you hold on for dear life thinking you can make it (that was created before you) change for your benefit.

People still want to be a member? The you get the benefit of being grabbed off the street for doing what they say members can't do.

And good for you, you get room, and board, and chaperoned/supervised recreation.

Welcome to the citizen-ship!

Anonymous said...

If corporate US still has citizens in Illinois, then that law is for you.
Enjoy it.
and if you are too afraid to renounce your citizenship (cause you said yes on your driver's license I guarantee it, and probably said yes on any ID you have, I guarantee it)
Then it's a benefit. A compelled benefit, but a benefit by 'silence is acquiescense'

How many people called and went by and said, hell no, I'm not going for it!
very few. Those that did are probably on a list to be released if grabbed by the authority enforcing that mess.

Stop complaining

Anonymous said...

"Law" 'tis NOT!! People's right to record public servant's actions is protected in BoRs & required to keep them accountable to we the people. Perhaps it's a "statute", code or regulation, which DO NOT APPLY to living people NOT employed by gubmnt, except by one's CONSENT. When does one decide to say I DO NOT CONSENT 2 Ur jurisdiction, which i am outside & beyond?
Being a "citizen" is another of the traps placing one within their jurisdiction. People need to learn true LAW, which is really quite simple; no harmed (wo)man= no crime!! gubmnt does not qualify as a "harmed party", as they are to serve we the people. Has situation gotten out of hand?

PEACEFUL & LAWFUL Solution: Grassroots UCLGJs whose administration is now lawfully constituted in all American counties by the people for the people, & of the people. Learn more from one invited by governor candidate to share same on live local radio interview: http://americamatters.us/show-archives/ select Just The Facts, then: 14-10-25 Just The Facts.mp3 Listen, then see, hear & LIKE new “NOW Declaration of Independence” @ http://youtu.be/WyXteb01PAQ with reference to QW copy source for awareness, distribution, & execution by oath keepers & other concerned people. ONLY THE PEOPLE CAN SAVE AMERICA (empowered from Above within!)! Blessings 2 ALL Liberty-lovers & those who benefit from BEing & DOing same ... in Love, Peace, Joy, Forgiveness, & more-- freeMom7 :D

Anonymous said...

Everybody on this site needs to QUIT jumping to conclusion about everything that is said here and start doing a little research of their own before jumping to wild conclusions!!! Read the damn bill first and you will see some surprising items, like how (on the last line) they actually confess to being UNDER COMMON LAW JURISDICTION!!!

Quit being uneducated sheeple and decide things for yourselves as that is the ONLY way we are going to get out of this mess.Here is just a small tidbit of the actual proposed amendment:
"(b) Eavesdropper.
An eavesdropper is any person, including any law
Enforcement officer and any party to a private conversation
officers, who is a principal, as defined in this Article
, or who operates or participates in the operation of any
eavesdropping device contrary to the provisions of this Article
or who acts as a principal, as defined in this Article.
(c) Principal.
A principal is any person who:
(1) Knowingly employs another who illegally uses an
eavesdropping device in the course of such employment; or
(2) Knowingly derives any benefit or information from
the illegal use of an eavesdropping device by another; or
(3) Directs another to use an eavesdropping device
illegally on his
or her behalf.
(d)
Private Conversation.
For the purposes of this Article,
"private the term conversation
" means any oral communication between 2 or more persons
, whether in person or transmitted between the parties
by wire or other means, when regardless of whether
one or more of the parties intended the their communication to be of a private nature under circumstances reasonably justifying that expectation.
A reasonable expectation shall include any
expectation recognized by law, including, but not limited to,
an expectation derived from a privilege, immunity, or right
established by common law, Supreme Court rule, or the Illinois or United States Constitution."


Dan said...

If you get one reading of this is that is states; you will get Freedom for the 'person' with the police and you did NOT get the Permission of the Police to record them;
“(2) Knowingly derives any benefit or information from
the illegal use of an eavesdropping device by another;”
so this is a crime according to the Court.

Anonymous said...

This is a felony under federal civil rights laws. The state official trying to enforce this can be fined and or imprisoned.