Warning-USA! Deadly Levels of Radiation Escalate and Growing At
Unprecedented Rate! Experts Are Very Concerned (Shocking Videos)
Monday, December 8, 2014 7:37
Government and private radiation stations pick up coast to
coast climb surpassing summer surge
These alarming levels come as the heaviest travel days of
the year have millions of Americans flying through air that they have no idea
may be impacted by dangerous levels of radiation. No information exists in any
airport in the United States that alerts travelers to the danger. EnviroReporter.Com
But
why? Experts are greatly concerned, though unsure if it is a result of Fukushima,
or something much more sinister. What is happening? Could it be that the world
as we know it is falling apart, just like we were warned would happen in the
book of Revelation?
FEATURE VIDEO
According
to EnviroReporter.Com:
Government and private radiation stations pick up coast to
coast climb surpassing summer surge
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency RadNet radiation
monitors have detected renewed surges in atmospheric readings of dangerous beta
radiation across the country. Over a dozen metropolitan test sites have
registered four-month highs in EnviroReporter.com’s most recent
comprehensive assessment. These figures, compiled from government graphs
and organized at RadNet Air Monitoring,
show even greater radiation levels than the already high detection exposed in
the August 7 article U.S. air radiation surges higher.
Beta radiation-impacted cities in this fall included San
Diego, Bakersfield, Phoenix, Amarillo, Montgomery and Madison. Some of these
RadNet sites recorded beta readings literally going off the chart at 1,000
total beta counts per minute (CPM). Though Los Angeles’ beta station
hasn’t worked in over a year,EnviroReporter.com tracks beta emissions
through dust analysis from HEPA filter machines located in its Santa Monica offices.
The latest period’s beta radiation detections were over eight times the same
sources readings in late summer.
Some of the highest registering cities also were markedly
higher than the same site readings shown on RadNet in 2013. Compared to its November
27, 2013 reading, Tuscon’s 460 CPM reading on the same date a year later was
over 10 times more elevated. Phoenix’s November 28 reading of 735 CPM was over
21 times higher than exactly a year ago. San Diego, which has inexplicably
seen its airborne beta analyses skyrocket over the last year, hit 650 CPM
October 1. That huge measurement, in a town with normal background around 20
CPM, was 60 times higher on the same date in 2014 than in 2013.
One commenter
shared his concerns, stating:
“These readings seem astronomically high,” said
one EnviroReporter.com commenter in response to our November 23
Nationwide Radiation Report. “What could be the cause of such a surge in
radioactivity? I find it hard to believe that it is all from Fukushima unless
something there has changed dramatically, such as a collapse of one of the
pools used to store and cool spent fuel rods. Any ideas? This could have a very
severe impact on our health and the health of our environment. I’m very
concerned.”
It
is important for us to know just how much radiation is accumulating in our air
in comparison to normal background numbers. This is vital in order that the
overall population can be somewhat protected from these poisons, which are
odorless, tasteless, and invisible. EnviroReporter.com, as well as experts
and manufacturers, consider 100 CPM to be an alarming trigger. Coincidentally,
many United States cities transcended this minimum with astronomical
figures, measuring many multiples of anything that could possibly be regarded
as insignificant.
EnviroReporter
also stated that:
Radiation levels exceeding three times background
concentrations are considered a tripwire for concern as well, with 100 CPM
approximately equating this level. The California Highway Patrol deems anything
above this threshold as a potential hazardous material situation necessitating
appropriate HazMat protocols.
A private citizen-sourced radiation network has identified
at least one hot spot in St. Charles, Illinois. Information
supplied EnviroReporter.com from Australian environmental activist Alan
Manson shows extremely elevated readings in St. Charles, Illinois.“I have been
accessing certain radiation monitoring sites across the USA through
the http://netc.com website
for a while now, and have noted that one site west
of Chicago IL (St. Charles) is regularly producing extreme
readings every 24 hours as shown in the chart below,” Manson said in an email
toEnviroReporter.com November 28. “Below is the latest chart from St.
Charles that should be of extreme concern to anyone living in the Chicago area.
It concerns me that the authorities and the media are silent regarding this
dangerous situation.”
“At St. Charles IL, a peak reading of 7,298 was recorded
during November,” Manson wrote subsequently. “Of greater concern at this site,
regular emissions have been detected over the past 5 days, which commence
around 1 am and last for approximately 6 hours.”
Breaking
down the latest EPA Radnet numbers is a justifiable cause for
extraordinary concern in itself. These figures reveal just how toxic
this nation’s air really is. However, the mere statistics and data,
considering 75 percent of it is missing, may be in jeopardy soon enough
as Congress will more than likely be eagerly awaiting to cut any
program that could potentially place the formidable nuclear industrial
complex under fire.
It
should come as no surprise that in a January article from ENE (Energy) News, it
was stated that:
Half Moon Bay Review,
Jan. 3, 2014 at 8:21p ET: [San Mateo] County health officials first
learned of the radiation levels last week, and they sent their own inspector on
Dec. 28 to Pacifica [...] the county inspector measured the beach to have a
radiation level of about 100 micro-REM per hour [1 microsievert per hour], or
about five times the normal amount. [...] Although the radiation levels were
clearly higher than is typical, [San Mateo County environmental health director
Dean Peterson] emphasized that it was still not unsafe for humans. [...]
Peterson admitted he was “befuddled” as to why radiation levels were higher
than normal, but he was skeptical that the Fukushima meltdown could be the
cause. He noted that many innocuous items could spike the radiation levels in
an area, including red-painted disposable eating utensils. [...] Peterson
forwarded the matter to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and state
Department of Public Health [...]
With
all the information given, I am seriously wondering why the inspector,
befuddled as to why the radiation levels were higher than normal, would state
that it was unsafe for humans, or a reason for immediate concern.
Dean
Peterson, San Mateo County environmental health director stated that, “It’s
not something that we feel is an immediate public health concern [...] We’re
not even close to the point of saying that any of this is from Fukushima. [...]
I honestly think the end result of this is that it’s just higher levels of
background radiation.”
To
read more, please CLICK HERE to EnviroReporter.Com, Energy News
No comments:
Post a Comment