Tuesday, April 7, 2015

Geologist claims Jesus was married... and had a SON: Expert says he has proof son of God was buried in 'family tomb' along with wife Mary and his brother

Geologist claims Jesus was married... and had a SON: Expert says he has proof son of God was buried in 'family tomb' along with wife Mary and his brother

  • Geologist ran 150 chemical tests on ossuaries and 'Jesus Family tomb'
  • Claims chemical signature proves James Ossuary was at Jerusalem site 
  • Chalk box bears inscription ‘James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus’
  • Find suggests Jesus fathered a child and was married

An Israeli geologist claims he has ‘confirmed’ the existence and authenticity of a tomb belonging to Jesus and his son in Jerusalem.
After extensive chemical tests, Dr Arye Shimron says he has linked the James Ossuary – a 1st-century chalk box that some believe hold the bones of Jesus' brother – to the long disputed ‘Jesus Family tomb’ in the city’s East Talpiot neighbourhood.
The research could have enormous ramifications as it suggests that Jesus was married, fathered a child and that a physical resurrection did not take place.
Scroll down for video  
After running 150 chemical tests, an expert claims to have linked the James Ossuary (pictured) – a 1st-century chalk box that was used for containing the bones of the dead – to the long disputed ‘Jesus Family tomb’ in the city’s East Talpiot neighbourhood
+7
After running 150 chemical tests, an expert claims to have linked the James Ossuary (pictured) – a 1st-century chalk box that was used for containing the bones of the dead – to the long disputed ‘Jesus Family tomb’ in the city’s East Talpiot neighbourhood
According to geoarcheologist Dr Shimron, the 'son of God' was buried with nine other people, including ‘Judah, son of Jesus’ and his wife, named Mary.
Dr Shimron’s work has renewed controversy over the Talpiot tomb, which was discovered in 1980 and dates back to the Second Temple period and the time of Jesus,The Jerusalem Post reported. 

Bones were discovered inside ossuaries, including one that bore the inscription, ‘Jesus, son of Joseph'.
Others included the names Maria, Joseph, Mary, Yose, Matthew and most controversially, ‘Judah, son of Jesus’.
Joseph, Mary and Jesus were all common names at the time and a statistician from the University of Toronto said that they each made up eight per cent of the population.
However, a very small percentage would have had the same family name combination as described in the Bible. 
Dr Shimron’s work has renewed the controversy over the Talpiot tomb, which was found in 1980 and dates back to the Second Temple period and the time of Jesus (a portrait is pictured)
+7
Dr Shimron’s work has renewed the controversy over the Talpiot tomb, which was found in 1980 and dates back to the Second Temple period and the time of Jesus (a portrait is pictured)
The long-disputed long disputed ‘Jesus Family tomb’ in the city’s East Talpiot neighbourhood (marked) and is now sealed beneath a concrete slab after building work took place some years ago
+7
The long-disputed long disputed ‘Jesus Family tomb’ in the city’s East Talpiot neighbourhood (marked) and is now sealed beneath a concrete slab after building work took place some years ago
Probing this connection, Dr Shimron and documentary maker Simcha Jacobovici looked closer at the ossuaries, including the James Ossuary, which is held by a private owner and bears the inscription, ‘James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus’.

WHAT IS THE JAMES OSSUARY? 

The James Ossuary is a first century chalk example of a box that was used to hold the bones of the dead.
But it stands out because it bears the inscription 'James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus' on one side.
The inscription is considered significant because it may provide archaeological evidence of Jesus,
The existence of the ossuary was announced in 2002, but its authenticity was immediately challenged.
The box's owner was charged with forging part of the inscription and while he was found innocent seven years later, the judge said the acquittal 'does not mean that the inscription on the ossuary is authentic or that it was written 2,000 years ago'.
Now, Dr Shimron claims the chemical signature on the ‘crust’ of the box matches that of a tomb in Jerusalem known as the ‘Jesus Family tomb’ where other ossuaries were found bearing the names of Jesus and Mary as well as ‘Judah, son of Jesus’.
The owner of the ossuary, Oded Golan, was accused of forging the inscription shortly after its discovery by an academic from the Sorbonne in Paris, but he was later found innocent.
Other experts and archaeologists have rejected the claim that the Jerusalem tomb is connected with Jesus at all.
Recently Dr Shimron gained access to the James Ossuary and scraped beneath the box's patina, the layer that forms on metal over time.
He ran around 150 tests on the chemistry of samples from 25 different ossuaries – 15 of which were from unrelated tombs – and found that traces of magnesium, iron and silicon from the James Ossuary matched the chemical signature of Talpiot tomb.
The Talpiot ossuaries were covered in a thick layer of ‘Rendzina’ soil, which is characteristic of the hills of East Jerusalem when they were found and has a unique chemistry.
Dr Shimron worked from the assumption that an earthquake of 363AD flooded the tomb with soil and mud to cover the ossuaries, effectively forming a vacuum and freezing them in time.
Soil that seeped into the box matched that found in the Talpiot ossuaries, indicating that it had lain for years alongside others in the ‘holy’ location. 
Bones were discovered there in ossuaries, or chalk boxes, including one that bears the inscription, ‘Jesus, son of Joseph' with others bearing the names of Maria, Joseph, Mary, Yose, Matthew and most controversially, ‘Judah, son of Jesus’. Here an inscription that says 'Yoseph' on an ossuary
+7
Bones were discovered there in ossuaries, or chalk boxes, including one that bears the inscription, ‘Jesus, son of Joseph' with others bearing the names of Maria, Joseph, Mary, Yose, Matthew and most controversially, ‘Judah, son of Jesus’. Here an inscription that says 'Yoseph' on an ossuary
Because bones were found in the ossuaries, it could be argued that there was no bodily resurrection (portrayed in this tapestry) which is the belief of more traditional Christians, while others accept the event was spiritual
+7
Because bones were found in the ossuaries, it could be argued that there was no bodily resurrection (portrayed in this tapestry) which is the belief of more traditional Christians, while others accept the event was spiritual

JESUS IS A MYTH AND WAS PROBABLY MANY PEOPLE, WRITER CLAIMS

Jesus Christ was not a real person and is probably the result of a combination of stories about several different individuals, according to a writer and leading atheist activist.
David Fitzgerald, a San Francisco based author, believes he has compiled compelling evidence that proves Jesus did not exist.
He claims there are no contemporary mentions of Jesus in historical accounts from the time when he was supposed to have lived, yet other Jewish sect leaders from the time do appear.
Jesus Christ was not a real person and is probably the result of a combination of stories about several different individuals, according to a writer and leading atheist activist. A mosaic of Christ is shown
+7
Jesus Christ was not a real person and is probably the result of a combination of stories about several different individuals, according to a writer and leading atheist activist. A mosaic of Christ is shown
He also points to discrepancies in the early gospels of Mark, Matthew and Luke, claiming these were written decades after the supposed time of Jesus.
Instead he insists the disciples of Jesus were also probably not real and their names only later attached to the gospels to lend them credence.
Speaking to MailOnline, he said: 'There is a paradox that Jesus did all these amazing things and taught all these amazing things yet no one heard of him outside his immediate cult for nearly 100 years.
'Or it means he didn't do all these things at all.
'The first gospel of Christianity appears to have been a literary allegory that were written decades after the time they portray.
'I believe that Christianity started as one of the many mystery faiths that appeared at the time where old Gods and old traditions were rebooted.
'Christianity appears to have been a Jewish mystery faith.
David Fitzgerald told MailOnline: 'There is a paradox that Jesus did all these amazing things and taught all these amazing things yet no one heard of him outside his immediate cult for nearly 100 years'. The famous statue of Christ the Redeemer in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, is shown
+7
David Fitzgerald told MailOnline: 'There is a paradox that Jesus did all these amazing things and taught all these amazing things yet no one heard of him outside his immediate cult for nearly 100 years'. The famous statue of Christ the Redeemer in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, is shown
'By the time of Paul there appears to have been plenty of different "Lord's suppers" as he complains about the existence of other gospels and messiahs.
'It appears that early Christianity managed to take the stories from these other faiths and incorporate them into the story of Jesus.'
Mr Fitzgerald said: 'There is nothing implausible to think that Jesus was a real person, but I just don't think that he can have been a single person if he existed at all.
'We also have no mention of Jesus in other historical texts from the time. There were certainly people writing about Judea at the time like Philo of Alexandria.
'During this period there were many other messiahs and wannabe messiahs who did far less exciting things than Jesus, but all of them managed something Jesus did not - to make a dent on the historical record.
'Two billion people believe all these miracles happened yet there is no evidence they did.'
Jacobovici told The Jerusalem Post: ‘This find illustrates that the James Ossuary is authentic and the Jesus Family tomb indeed belongs to the family of Jesus of Nazareth.’
Dr Shumron told The New York Times: ‘I think I’ve got really powerful, virtually unequivocal evidence that the James ossuary spent most of its lifetime, or death time, in the Talpiot Tomb.’ 
The retired senior researchers of the Geological Survey of Israel, added: ‘ The evidence is beyond what I expected.’ 
The duo are aware that the findings could rock the Christian church, but insist the research is scientific and not theological.
Because bones were found in the ossuaries, it could be argued that there was no bodily resurrection, which is the belief of more traditional Christians, while others accept the event was spiritual.
The Talpiot tomb is now sealed under a concrete slab, while the ossuaries found there are in the hands of the Israel Antiquities Authority.
The James Ossuary is kept in a secret location by its owner, who lives in Tel Aviv.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Yes and you probably will claim to have a retinal scan of him too. There were a lot of people named Jesus and Joseph back in that time. They were popular names. How do you exppplaiin it away where the veil was rent in twain and many resurrected from their graves?

Anonymous said...

AMEN 5:49 PM! OBVIOUS that the author and perhaps the poster of this trash have NEVER encountered the Lord Jesus Christ on a PERSONAL BASIS!!!! 2 Peter 3:3 King James Bible Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, Every reason and excuse they can contrive to excuse themselves from the truth and reality of the Lord God so they can continue in their sins, you can believe these will be used - as throughout the above article. How timely - posted at the Easter season - easy to discern the spiritual condition of the writer and poster.

Anonymous said...

Retinal scan, finger prints, DNA, large glossy photographs, living witnesses, blah blah blah. Amazing how this one individual - the Lord Jesus Christ - receives the scorn, wrath and ridicule of most of the world, especially among those who profess to be 'educated' and having 'ascended' to higher levels (yeah - of demonic foolery). Wonder what they will have to say to the Father God when that times comes for them to make their appearance?

Lovemylife said...

No, it is not that easy to ascertain the writer and the poster, and their meanings. I post, so that you may have the ease and convenience of knowing what is going on in this world, without going to multiple places. It does not mean that I agree with the article, it means, that I had read it, and it sparked something in me enough that I thought all of you might want to see this. You think you know me, but you don't. I put my ass on the line everyday for people like you can judge me. Matthew 7:1-5 “Judge not, that you be not judged. For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged, and with the measure you use it will be measured to you. Why do you see the speck that is in your brother's eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when there is the log in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother's eye. Look, I post things that are controversial so that people will stop and think. It does not mean that I believe in them. I also posted about the US Air Force that was captured by the Japanese that were experimented on alive. Do you think I like that as well. I work to give you a right to judge me, but, please don't bite the hand that feeds you. God Bless Brother or Sister.

Lovemylife said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

To Lovemylife, why must you use crude language?

Anonymous said...

Read an overview of a book called 'Egypt Knew No Pharaohs Nor Israelites'
by Dr. Ashraf Ezzat, @ http://oneworldofnations.com

The compelling part of the book was a map depicting ancient 'trade routes'.
The tribes continually raiding and stealing from these caravans were the so called 'Israelites' of the day.
Ultimately, the Babylonians (who were being stolen from), came up with the idea that if they couldn't stop their thieving behaviour,
they would capture them and bring them to Babylon.

Further in the evidence the writer says it can be proven that the 'Israelites' were from Saudi Arabia and
North Yemen originally.
They were never natives of Egypt or Palestine.
The ancient Jews fabricated all the stories in the bible from borrowed accounts from surrounding cultures.
They fraudulently substituted themselves as the ones being mistreated.

The article points the finger at the Zionists of today, giving orders to the Mossad using our US military
at the start of the invasion to Iraq to steal valuable artifacts and tablets in cuneiform, that when translated
will prove these Israelites' true actions in history.
In short, the Zionists do not want it found out what a fraud the whole Jew story/history really is, which is made up.
Sad to say, lots of valuable physical artifacts have been stolen by US participants, removed to the US and Israel, where they can copy/duplicate/alter whatever they want, to project/perpetuate their big myth.
This is how they have always done things.
The coverup is as bad as, if not worse than their crimes.
Think about it, then try to realize how they have editorialised everything since day one.

They only thing they were chosen to be is the world's biggest pain in the ass.
They have delusions over dominating the middle east. Why? Why should it be them?
Money, oil, water rights...greed and power.

The article demonstrates that Jews wear their 'skull caps' same as Arabs do, as one point to prove
their true geographic origins.

It really is high time people STOP believing the biblical 'stories', and study the historical, passed down versions and re-writes, that are always intended to be favorable toward them.
It would seem, they, along with their Vatican counterparts,
have never been to far apart
in their quest for
wealth, global and human control.