Sen. Rand Paul voted yes for the $650 billion 2013 NDAA.....
SO YOU WANT RAND PAUL FOR PRESIDENT (CEO) OF THE CORPORATION....BUT THAT CORPORATION LOSTIT CHARTER....
NOT SO QUICK!!!!!!! THE SOB VOTED FOR THE NDAA..... THEREFORE HE COMMITTED TREASON.... WE WILL BE POSTING MUCH MORE ON ALLTHE AHO'S....HE IS NOT A GOOD GUY LIKE YOU THINK!!! AS A MATTER OF FACT ....THE WHOLE SENATE VOTED FOR THIS.....LOOK IT UP AND.... E D U C A T E..... YOURSELF......THIS IS AN ACT OF TREASON AGAINST THE US CITIZEN....SO I SAY HIT THE ROAD JACK.....
Rand Paul alias......... The Duper
Getty
The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) has been passed again. By a vote of 98-0, the 2013 NDAA was unanimously passed in the Senate Tuesday evening. Sen. Rockefeller (D-WV) and Sen. Kirk (R-IL) abstained from voting. The controversial bill authorizes funding for the 2013 military.
Somewhere, in the midst of the $650 billion funding bill, mixed in with $88.5 billion for ongoing wars and $60 billion for the Navy’s F-18 fighter program, remains the indefinite detention clause that had many so upset in 2012, with some slight changes.
The bill included Paul's amendment, which he claims makes it so the government can no longer indefinitely detain American citizens. Paul's amendment to the 2013 NDAA included the right to trial for “citizens and permanent legal residents”, despite the fact that the Constitution demands all accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial. Paul's amendment does nothing to stop the government from stripping someone of their citizenship. Under the Enemy Expatriation Act, for example, the U.S. government could make an American "no longer an American", without even taking that person to court. Paul's amendment can do little to stop that, in fact, it seems his amendment was simply to make people feel better about the U.S. government indefinitely detaining people, and so Paul could attempt to justify this vote for the NDAA.
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) angered many of his father’s supporters by voting for the 2013 NDAA. Doug Stafford, Paul’s chief of staff, stated that Sen. Paul believes that “the full panoply of due process rights should apply to all persons, not just American citizens.” Sen. Paul, however, still voted for the passage of the NDAA.
The NDAA has passed 51 years in a row. The 2013 version of the monolithic bill includes not just funding for the military operations of the country, but also harsher sanctions for Iran. The military will be purchasing Strykers, Chinooks, Black Hawks, and many other machines of war in 2013, all approved by Sen. Rand Paul.
If you wish to ensure you receive email updates to all of Angel's articles please subscribe clicking the link above or join her Facebook Fan Page. Angel is also the Wilmington Prepper Examinerand the Wilmington Civil Rights Examiner. You can read Angel's last articlehere.Feel free to comment below and follow Angel on her Twitter! You may listen to Angel LIVE Monday through Friday from 5-7 pm EST on RadioFreedom.us. You may learn more about her Talk Radio Topics and the Radio Freedom News Network on The Angel Clark Show Fan Page!
Do you like Capitalism? Literally, of course.
Do you know the Secrets of the FED?
Write for Examiner.com! http://exm.nr/LCTV7H
7 comments:
All well and good Popeye....so......who do you think would make the best president?
It's scary to see a father and son so diametrically opposed. That makes Rand Paul no less a traitor. That Israel { sheenies, aka Hyksos } controls so much of the usA should scare everybody. LJ
Looks, to me, like General Ham never got the message that he was the, so called, interim president of the Republic for the united States of America. Rand Paul aint gonna be either. Rand Paul aint his daddy. The Republic will not be de facto it will be de jure; under the Constitution, Bill of Rights, Declaration of Independence, Common Law and NESARA.
The best president for the De Jure republic is R.A.H. and he is interim right now. He wasappointed by a lawfull assembly.
Oh HELL NO!!!!!
There is over 90 million americans who are outraged now, and very awake to at least one part of this agenda!!!
People did not put their lives on the line, their entire futures and their other respective agreements to settle for a bullshit fake De Facto regime!!!
It will be "De Jure" Republic, or it will not come about!
We see they are terrified now!
People didn't get stepped upon by the fascists over and over again, to settle for anything less. Get rid of the pleasantries and cut through the remaining defenses, restore the Republic.
Likewise, the other organization is a world owned corporation that stands for Agenda 21....
Only the fully restored Republic can and will take the grid down.
Alferd E Newman
Better get your terms straight before you write your article A "De facto" government is what we have now. "De jure" is the constitutional, legal republic we are seeking. Some of the comments above have it rights. If you don't know the difference, how can we pay attention to anything else in your article?
Post a Comment