I NO LONGER CARE WHAT "NEWSMAX" HAS TO SAY....
I X'D OUT ALL DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS A LONG TIME AGO..
I REALIZE NOW "WHERE THERE TIPS" ARE COMING FROM
CONCERNING FINANCE AND HOW THEY ARE LEADING PEOPLE
INTO THE STOCK MARKET ON BEHALF OF THE ILLUMINATI.
THEY CAN NO LONGER BE TRUSTED !!
( BY NOW YOU MUST KNOW THE STOCK MARKET HAS ALWAYS BEEN "RIGGED" )
They don't sell stock.. but they sure "direct your thinking"
( BY NOW YOU MUST KNOW THE STOCK MARKET HAS ALWAYS BEEN "RIGGED" )
They don't sell stock.. but they sure "direct your thinking"
THEY HAVE BEEN ASSISTING THE ILLUMINATI !!
MORE BRAINWASHING ???
THE FACT THAT THEY ARE FUNDING A CLINTON FOUNDATION
THAT PURPOSELY USES THEIR FUNDS TO INFILTRATE COUNTRIES
AND HELP PEOPLE DIE EARLIER.. IS ENOUGH FOR ME !!
BEWARE OF STRANGERS ( AND FOUNDATIONS ) BEARING GIFTS !!
GOOD OLE BILL IS IN THE SAME LEAGUE AS
BILL >DEPOPULATE THE WORLD< GATES...
LOOKS LIKE "Chris Ruddy" WILL BE ADDED TO MY LIST !
BEWARE OF STRANGERS ( AND FOUNDATIONS ) BEARING GIFTS !!
GOOD OLE BILL IS IN THE SAME LEAGUE AS
BILL >DEPOPULATE THE WORLD< GATES...
LOOKS LIKE "Chris Ruddy" WILL BE ADDED TO MY LIST !
HOW ABOUT STOPPING 'newsmax' MAIL AND YOUR COSTLY
SUBSCRIPTIONS WHICH HELPED TO FUND THE CLINTON'S ???
and any other publication that comes from NEWSMAX ??
THAT IS HOW YOU "VOTE" -- REMOVE THEM !!
STOP GIVING THEM YOUR "HARD EARNED" $$$ !!
and any other publication that comes from NEWSMAX ??
THAT IS HOW YOU "VOTE" -- REMOVE THEM !!
STOP GIVING THEM YOUR "HARD EARNED" $$$ !!
CANCEL NEWSMAX "PERMANENTLY"
THEN CHECK OUT OTHER "LIKE" COMPANIES !!
THE ONLY WAY TO GET SOMEONE'S ATTENTION THESE DAYS
IS TO HIT THEM IN THEIR "POCKET BOOK"
IN BED WITH THE CLINTONS: <<PROBABLY SO
Conservative Website, Newsmax,
Pledges $1 Million
to Clinton Foundation
Posted on May 16, 2015
How lovely…Conservative website Newsmax has pledged a very large donation to the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation, a new report in the Wall Street Journal states.“Newsmax, a conservative news organization, last year pledged $1 million to the Clinton Foundation over a five-year period, according to a spokesman for Chris Ruddy, the organization’s CEO. Mr. Ruddy has been friends with the Clintons since 2007,” reports the Journal.“Through a spokesman, he said the donation wasn’t tantamount to an endorsement of Mrs. Clinton’s potential campaign, though he thinks she would ‘make a great presidential candidate.'”
Read more: weeklystandard.com
→ OWNER OF NEWSMAX: In Defense of the Clinton Foundation
NOTE:
MAKES ME WONDER WHAT THEY HAVE ON THIS GUY????
HOW MANY "RITUALS" HAS HE ATTENDED ?
I HAVE HIGHLIGHTED THE "KISS- _SS" PARTS BELOW
EVERY TIME I THINK SOMEONE IS "OK" THEY TURN OUT TO
BE "ONE OF THOSE" AND HOW LOOSELY HE USES THE NAME
"GOD" WHICH GOD? --god ?? IS HE REFERRING TO..?
BECAUSE WE NOW KNOW WHO THE BUSHES AND CLINTON'S
AND EVEN GOOD OLE JIMMY CARTER'S "god" REALLY IS !!!
THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH DEM'S OR REPUB'S SINCE THEY
ARE ONE AND THE SAME.. IT HAS TO DO WITH HIS ALLEGIANCE
TO THE ILLUMINATI..AND THESE "OFFENDERS OF THE AMERICAN
PEOPLE..."
GOT TO GO NOW.. HAVE TO GO "PUKE" !!
OWNER OF NEWSMAX:
In Defense of the Clinton Foundation
Posted on May 16, 2015
Something smells. Why is a right-leaning website owner defending, and donating, an extremely liberal organization? << i DON'T KNOW WHO WROTE THIS LINE..I AGREE.. BUT I NEVER GAVE "slick willie" one
thin dime..
When I heard that Bill Clinton was making as much as
$500,000 per speech and made many more millions in his post-presidency, I
thought to myself, God bless him. This is the American way.
Former President Clinton’s speaker fees are probably in line with
other former presidents who draw big fees, maybe bigger owing to his
global popularity.
But God bless them all.
Business and organizations love to rub shoulders with iconic American
leaders — though the money Clinton has earned is probably a fraction of
what President George H.W. Bush made by signing up with The Carlyle
Group, an international conglomerate that made most of its initial money
from U.S. defense contracts and from foreign countries like Saudi
Arabia.
The elder Bush served his country admirably over a long period,
starting in World War II as a heroic pilot, and later in several public
offices, including the presidency. He later got his reward after leaving
the White House.
God bless George H.W. Bush.
So, it is not every day that I defend Bill and Hillary Clinton, or the Clinton Foundation.
In fact, it may come as a surprise to some. In the 1990s I was
described by both James Carville and George Stephanopoulos as the
Clinton White House’s No. 1 press enemy. But after Bill Clinton left the
White House,
I came to admire him and his post-presidential work.
I was drawn to him largely for the very same reason he and his wife
are being criticized today: the Clinton Foundation. Over time, I was
impressed enough with its work that I even became a donor.
This may be difficult for many of the Clinton critics to stomach,
considering the miasma of allegations now being made about them, largely
due to a new book entitled “Clinton Cash” (HarperCollins) by Peter
Schweizer.
A Fox News special that aired this past Friday detailed many of the
allegations from the still-unreleased book. Fox said the book showed the
“tangled” and “blurred” relationships between the Clinton Foundation
and the Clintons’ private or political activities.
After watching the Fox program, it became clear to me the only thing
“tangled” and “blurred” are the numerous unsubstantiated, unconnected,
and baseless allegations being made about them.
John Cassidy, a columnist with The New Yorker, fair-minded and
balanced, got it right when he wrote that “Clinton Cash” appears to
contain “largely unsubstantiated allegations.”
He notes that Schweizer admits he cannot prove the allegations, and
that “with [Fox News’ Sean] Hannity and other conservative media figures
piling on, the Clinton campaign will be able to portray questions about
the Clinton Foundation and the family’s finances as a political
witch-hunt rather than a legitimate exercise in vetting presidential
candidates.”
Even Bill O’Reilly, who has a penchant for telling the truth, told
his Fox audience that the Clintons deserved the “presumption of
innocence” and that “right now the evidence is circumstantial, not
vetted, and the subject of wild speculation by anti-Clinton forces.”
Don’t get me wrong, if there were any serious allegations here, I too
would want to have them investigated. But I also don’t want to go back
to the ’90s, either, when one allegation led to a daisy-chain effect,
and the GOP ended up looking bad as the Democrats kept winning.
But let’s get back to the matter of the Clintons and their
foundation. I have been involved with the foundation for over seven
years now. During that time, I have always found it nonpartisan. I have
never felt the whiff of politics from either its staff or any of its
activities.
I recall attending my first Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) event and
meeting Jack Kemp there. As you may remember, Kemp had run against Bill
Clinton in the 1996 presidential race as the vice presidential
candidate. At that meeting, Kemp had nothing but praise for what Bill
Clinton was doing.
So what was the former president doing?
Rather than simply “cashing in,” the young former president wanted to
devote a substantial amount of his time and energy to making the world a
better place, improving the lives of poor people and, at the same time,
demonstrating in a real way that Americans cared.
Remember also the context of the time. America was globally
criticized during its war on terror, especially after the invasion of
Iraq. Few nations joined the “coalition of the willing.” Our nation was
losing its stature as leader of the free world.
It was Bill Clinton, using the platform of his foundation, who became the de facto goodwill ambassador of the United States.
I know for a fact that then-President Bush was deeply appreciative of
Bill Clinton’s help during this period. Let’s not forget that it was
George W. Bush who had so much confidence in Bill Clinton that he asked
him to co-chair with his dad, Bush 41, both the Tsunami and Katrina
relief efforts. (Later, Obama personally asked Bill Clinton to co-chair
the Haiti relief effort.)
Compare for a second how Bill Clinton has continued to serve
America’s best interests abroad with former President Jimmy Carter, who
has not always done so.
Read more: Newsmax
No comments:
Post a Comment