Sunday, February 7, 2016

Nepotism and corruption in the Hammond case?


Nepotism and corruption in the Hammond case? Can Anybody refute this?


These articles both appeared on the Shasta Lantern website. This is the way government operates. They can't make it on merit of a case or law, so they have to rig the deal. Just like the ambush. Have Obama state that he is sending in his best 'crisis negotiator' and then he laughs as they carry out the ambush and commit murder. That is how he negotiates. Now all they have to do is alter all the evidence, that they control, to fit the script that they released to the media.

Power Corrupts Absolutely: Ties that Bind Run Deep with Aiken Family in Hammond Case

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

Won't make a difference, there is no enforcement for the common law grand jury.

Anonymous said...

What you mean is, a "common law grand jury" has no value at all.

Anonymous said...

Not a common law Grand Jury but a State Grand Jury will find the rest of these traitors guilty and enforce the writs with prejudice. They operate by the common law of oregon's state.

No one needs a "Common Law Grand Jury" for serving these indictments upon the people responsible. They only need to enforce the law, all the Common Law Jury is allowed to do is recommend presentments.

Anonymous said...

None that I have seen. I would love for someone to prove me wrong.

Anonymous said...

Once again, won't matter. If they are convicted in state court, the federal court will step in and set aside the conviction, just as they did with Lon Tomohisa Horiuchi, the sniper who shot Vicky Weaver.

Anonymous said...

IT WON'T MATTER IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE.

THE DISTRICT COURTS HAVE TO ABIDE BY COMMON LAW.

It will be a federal conviction under federal sentencing guidelines only, and they will go to prison. The Jury will clean the rest of them out and settle cases for any of them who were killed by militia.

Anonymous said...

IT WILL MATTER IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE.

THE USA INCORPORATED IS BANKRUPT AND DISSOLVED.

THEY CAN DO NOTHING WHEN THE CONVICTIONS COME IN. THE ONES THAT HANG THEY COULD DO NOTHING ABOUT, SINCE THE CORP IS CIVILLY DEAD.

Anonymous said...

Added to the above comments, it does matter because Oregon is one of the only east coast states where more than 70% of the population agrees with states like South Dakota who already kicked the feds out.

Just because a liberal haven like portland does not agree, doesn't mean they won't come around to agree with them fairly quickly. If oregon is allowed to be destroyed by the feds it will have repercussions for all trade routes. Thus the feds will be sentenced by jury in oregon.

Anonymous said...

This just sounds delusional. I keep reading the feds have no common law jurisdiction, only maritime/admiralty jurisdiction. They have no common law jurisdiction, or jurisdiction within the states, Now you say the federal courts are bound by common law. What would be the 'federal' charges?

I see no dissolution of the bankrupt US, only business as usual, If you are going by the fake judge's statements from Alaska, you are definitely delusional. She has no clue what she is talking about. After all, her fake liens were to end the bankrupt "corporate" government on January 16. It appears to be still alive and kicking.

Anonymous said...

The federal government is also under Common Law jurisdiction of the states. They are the rightful government which existed before any corporate shell game. You are grossly misinformed and now entirely out of your league altogether.

Anonymous said...

The only mechanism remaining that can be trusted is plenty of rope.