Sunday, June 30, 2013

Water and aspirin

Subject: Water and aspirin
To:




WATER & ASPIRIN

When to Drink Water; Great Info
How many folks do you know who say they don't want to drink anything
before going to bed because they'll have to get up during the night!!

Heart Attack and Water - I never knew all of this ! Interesting.......
Something else I didn't know ... I asked my Doctor why do people need to urinate so much at night time. Answer from my Cardiac Doctor -
Gravity holds water in the lower part of your body when you are upright (legs swell). When you lie down and the lower body (legs and etc) seeks level with the kidneys, it is then that the kidneys remove the water because it is easier. This then ties in with the last statement! I knew you need your minimum water to help flush the toxins out of your body, but this was news to me.
Correct time to drink water... Very Important. From A Cardiac Specialist!

Drinking water at a certain time maximizes its effectiveness on the body: 2 glasses of water after waking up - helps activate internal organs
1 glass of water 30 minutes before a meal - helps digestion
1 glass of water before taking a bath - helps lower blood pressure
1 glass of water before going to bed - avoids stroke or heart attack

I can also add to this... My Physician told me that water at bed time
will also help prevent night time leg cramps. Your leg muscles are seeking
hydration when they cramp and wake you up with a Charlie Horse.

Mayo Clinic Aspirin... Dr. Virend Somers, is a Cardiologist from the Mayo Clinic, who is lead author of the report in the July 29, 2008 issue of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

Most heart attacks occur in the day, generally between 6 A.M. and noon. Having one during the night, when the heart should be most at rest, means that something unusual happened. Somers and his colleagues have been working for a decade to show that sleep apnea is to blame.

1. If you take an aspirin or a baby aspirin once a day, take it at night.
The reason: Aspirin has a 24-hour "half-life"; therefore, if most heart attacks happen in the wee hours of the morning, the Aspirin would be strongest in your system.

2. FYI, Aspirin lasts a really long time in your medicine chest for years,
       (when it gets old, it smells like vinegar).

Please read on.
Something that we can do to help ourselves - nice to know.
Bayer is making crystal aspirin to dissolve instantly on the tongue.
They work much faster than the tablets.

Why keep Aspirin by your bedside? It's about Heart Attacks -

There are other symptoms of a heart attack, besides the pain on the left arm. One must also be aware of an intense pain on the chin, as well as nausea and lots of sweating; however, these symptoms may also occur less frequently.

Note: There may be NO pain in the chest during a heart attack.

The majority of people (about 60%) who had a heart attack during their sleep did not wake up.
However, if it occurs, the chest pain may wake you up from your deep sleep.

If that happens, immediately dissolve two aspirins in your mouth and swallow them with a bit of water.

Afterwards: - Call 911. - Phone a neighbor or a family member who lives very close by.
- Say "heart attack!" - Say that you have taken 2 Aspirins. - Take a seat on a chair or sofa near the front door, and wait for their arrival and ...DO NOT LIE DOWN!

A Cardiologist has stated that if each person after receiving this e-mail,
sends it to 10 people, probably one life could be saved!

I have already shared this information. What about you?

Do forward this message. It may save lives

Sheriffs won't pay the Income Tax?

Sheriffs,

Suggestion:
Have each of you Constitutional Sheriffs comply with your Oath of Office and Comply with the Republic of the united States' Constitution.
No longer pay the Income Tax on your labor as the united States Supreme Court ruled in 1883!
And put together a Grand Jury for ALL your info that We The People can use!
Meet with Jeff Maehr from Colorado who the IRS fears as he fails to file tax returns!
Meet with others; Joe Banister, Sherry Jackson, & Irwin Schiff (who is still in jail for the Zero Return)!
Get a sworn statement from Former IRS Director, Steve Miller, on the Income Tax being Voluntary or have him criminally prosecuted for lying under oath to Congress!
Once this is all done, collaborate together with ALL Constitutional Sheriffs and have each of your total Sheriffs' Dept make a notice to the IRS that you will NOT support a PRIVATE Corporation!
How will the IRS and THE UNITED STATES, INC. prosecute law enforcement who are complying with the Constitution?

Supreme Court Validates People’s Rights to Establish Common Law Grand Jury
http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2013/06/supreme-court-validates-peoples-rights_30.html
Subject: The Common Law 4th Branch Of Government-Legally Is The Common Law Grand Jury — Voted 6 to 3 Decision In The U.S. Supreme Court– Already started in CA and NY.

Former IRS Director Admits Taxes Are Voluntary
http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2013/06/former-irs-director-admits-taxes-are.html
Steve Miller, former Director of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), admitted at a Congressional hearing that the taxes collected by the IRS are not mandatory – but voluntary.

IRS ACTUALLY FEARS MAN WHO DOESN'T FILE TAXES
http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2013/06/irs-actually-fears-man-who-doesnt-file.html
Jeff Maehr, a Colorado chiropractor who has engaged in a number of business ventures, including PureHealthSystems.com, admits he has refused to file federal income tax returns since 2002, but he says the IRS is afraid to press criminal charges against him.

Supreme Court Denies Hearing On Major Challenge to Constitutionality of Income Tax
http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2013/06/supreme-court-denies-hearing-on-major.html
The U.S. Supreme Court itself said an 1883 case, “It has been well said that, the property which every man has in his own labor, as it is the original foundation of all other property, so it is the most sacred and inviolable.”

Dan

Remember receiving 'federal benefits' makes you a slave with no status...also makes SS checks taxable

Remember receiving 'federal benefits' makes you a slave with no status...also makes SS checks taxable,  I suspect most funds from them was already taxed or under other definitions  (not federal benefits) these checks are not taxable.  So send them a letter (and keep a copy of your notice to them)  that YOU DO NOT CONSENT to them classifying as a benefits or randomingly changing the meanings of words or laws to benefit them and harm us.  Also remember this is a government by CONSENT; time to remove our consent...no more legalising crime for them.
R

SOCIAL SECURITY CHECKS BECOMES FEDERAL BENEFIT CHECKS - MAKE THIS VIRAL
Posted By: Seawitch [Send E-Mail]
Date: Sunday, 30-Jun-2013 01:44:26

The last figure I heard was the Congress had borrowed almost 7 TRILLION dollars fron the SSI, will they ever pay it back?
Just a reminder, Better pass this around, it's the clearest presentation I have seen in quite some time.
Social Security check
Friday, April 20, 2013, 5:00 AM
Here we go.
JUST REALIZED THAT WITH REQUIRED AUTO DEPOSIT,
I NEVER GET TO SEE THE CHECK ....
ALERT EVERYONE YOU KNOW.
THIS AFFECTS ALL OF US.*
*Subject:*
SOCIAL SECURITY becomes FEDERAL BENEFIT CHECK
Have you noticed, the Social Security check is now referred to as a "Federal Benefit Payment"?
I'll be part of the one percent to forward this. I am forwarding it because it Touches a nerve in me, and I hope it will in you.
Please keep passing it on until everyone in our country has read it.
The government is now referring to our Social Security checks as
a Federal Benefit Payment.
This isn't a benefit. It is earned income! Not only did we all contribute to Social Security but our employers did too.
It totaled 15% of our income before taxes .
If you averaged $30K per year over your working life, that's close to $180,000 Invested in Social Security .
If you calculate the future value of your monthly investment in social security( $375/month, including both your and your employers contributions) at a meager 1% Interest rate
compounded monthly, after 40 years of working you'd have
more than $1.3+ million dollars saved!
This is your personal investment .
Upon retirement, if you took out only 3% per year , you'd receive $39,318 per year, or $3,277 per month .
That's almost three times more than today's average Social Security benefit of $1,230 per month,according to the Social Security Administration
(Google it - its a fact).
And your retirement fund would last more than 33 years (until you're 98 if you retire at age 65)! I can only imagine how much better most average-income people could live in retirement if our government had just invested our money in low-risk interest-earning accounts .
Instead, the folks in Washington pulled off a bigger Ponzi scheme than Bernie Madoff ever did.
They took our money andused it elsewhere.
They forgot (Knew) that it was OUR money they were taking.
They didn't have a referendum to ask us if we wanted to lend the money to them .
And they didn't pay interest on the debt they assumed .
And recently,they've told us that the money won't support us for very much longer .
But is it our fault they misused our investments?
And now, to add insult to injury, they're calling it a benefit , as if we never worked to earn every penny of it.
Offered by John C.
Just because they borrowed the money,
doesn't mean that our investments were a charity !
Let's take a stand .
We have earned our right to Social Security and Medicare.
Demand that our legislators bring some sense into our government .
Find a way to keep Social Security and Medicare going,
for the sake of that 92% of our population who need it.
*Then call it what it is:
Our Earned Retirement Income.
*99% of people won't forward this.
Will you?
*You can bet I WILL !!!*


America....Our Stolen Country-Part III

Subject: Fw: America....Our Stolen Country-Part III




                                      INSIST ON TRUTH OR SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES




                                                                                               OCT.2,2012                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
                                    AMERICA...OUR STOLEN COUNTRY - PART III

          When Dr.Terrence Lakin, former U.S.Army Lt.Col., began hearing of many legal challenges to Barack Obama's presidental eligibility, he, in compliance with his sworn oath (similar to Obama's) , to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic", went through military channels for clarification of this issue. Receiving no help, he then wrote directly to Obama, asking him to confirm that a valid "Certificate of Live Birth"(required by Hawaiian law) had been filed by him in 2008. In previous inquiries Obama never responded to others or he referred them to a "Certification of Live Birth"(COLB) which was posted on the Daily Kos website, as proof of his eligibility. In so doing, Obama lied to America. A COLB was not only inadequate for Presidential aspirants, as Obama, a Constitutional teacher, well knew but his copy had also been declared fraudulent by many computer document experts. Not once did Obama offer or even mention the existence of a valid "Certificate of Live Birth"(not a COLB), which might have confirmed his eligibility. Instead, he continued deceiving the Nation through the 2008 election! In Col.Lakin's case, Obama completely ignored his letter, the letter of a man who had given 18 years of faithful allegiance to America, merited a Bronze Star and became a leading flight surgeon charged with caring for the Chief of Staff's pilots and air crews. Feeling that Obama's authority to command had not been established, Col.Lakin refused a second deployment to Afghanistan. He was then arrested and underwent a military court-martial at which the presiding judge, Major General Carla Hawley-Bowland would not allow him to introduce any Obama records in his defense "lest they prove embarrassing to the President." (her words). Unbelievable! If Col.Lakin's attorney had wished to introduce the Constitution into the records because the oath taken to defend it was contained therein, would she also have rejected that request?

          The General's concern for sparing Obama possible "embarrassment" (read: a deception being exposed) overrode any concern for the truth.The "sham" guilty verdict was followed by a dishonorable discharge, loss of all pay and benefits and imprisonment. Her kangaroo court had done its job well! A man who had served his Country honorably was brought down by a "Commander -in-Thief", Barack Obama, the only President in our history who refused to produce a valid birth certificate of his own and who,unlawfully, remains in Office to this day. If anyone has doubts as to how far Obama would go to continue his deception please re-read the above.No terrorist could have inflicted more serious wounds upon Col.Lakin than did Obama by his ignoring the Colonel's request for transparency! Obama destroyed an American soldier's career in order to keep his own career intact.

                                                                                                    

          Consider: Two men took an oath to defend the Constitution. One (Col.Lakin) faithfully did for 18 years while the other, Obama, used lies, false documents and the "sound of silence" (aided by a subservient News Media} as he plotted to upend,not defend that same Constitution.. Just recently, he accidentally spoke before an "open" mike and America heard him telling his aides to "find a way to get around the Constitution!" Treasonous words, which spoke volumes as to Obama's moral honesty. To take an oath requires one to live that oath.

          Obama did find time to fill out a form with names of basketball teams he favored in an upcoming tournament and to go on multiple vacations, including one to Hawaii at the same time Lt.Col.Lakin was "leaving" for Leavenworth,Kansas Penitentiary. How sad....one traveled in comfort, the other in chains! Why? For seeking confirmation that the service and salute which each serviceman and woman rendered to their President was being received by someone entitled to command their allegiance. Col. Lakin, who spent years mending broken bodies now found himself incapacitated not by enemy action but by a man who repeatedly boasted of being "transparent".....unless his eligibility was being questioned. I pray that all recipients of this letter add their voices to the call for vindication and restoration of Lt.Col.Lakin to the Army, if he so desires and to demand that Obama, who constantly boasts of being "transparent" be ordered to produce whatever birth documents (if any) are in the Hawaiian Health Dept.files and submit them to an impartial analysis for verification. After the manner in which he treated Col.Lakin and others, we cannot expect Obama to voluntarily produce any records. After all,in his own words in Newsday, Aug.22,2010 in New York he unwittingly characterized himself when he said:"The only people who don't want to disclose the truth are those with something to hide". AMEN.

                                                                                                        (to be continued)

                                                                                                          robertquinn@earthlink.net

bcc:The U.S.Supreme Court, all mentioned herein, and my e-mail list. They, and all others

        receiving this letter may freely pass it on to others.

                                                                                                     Addendum

          Four years ago, I started reading and talking to others who were seeking the truth about Obama's eligibility. Today, I have no doubt he is a fraudulent pretender who has stolen our Presidency. He has used every trick possible to avoid having to show valid proof of his eligibility, even going as far as utilizing fraudulent documents. His willingness to destroy challengers at any cost and the manner which he employs shows contempt for truth and our Constitution. Producing a valid Certificate of Live Birth could have resolved this issue years ago. Even recently, his attorney notified a Georgia court that a subpoena issued which ordered Obama to appear in court would be ignored by him and neither Obama nor his attorney would appear in court to answer it....and they didn't. Sadly, the court acquiesced to him and Obama runs around telling listeners that Mitt Romney should exhibit "transparency" by releasing his prior tax returns. What a mockery. This is why I have devoted the above article to contrasting the courage of Col.Lakin to the cowardice of Barack Obama.

                                               

SOCIAL SECURITY CHECKS BECOMES FEDERAL BENEFIT CHECKS - MAKE THIS VIRAL

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

SOCIAL SECURITY CHECKS BECOMES FEDERAL BENEFIT CHECKS - MAKE THIS VIRAL
Posted By: Seawitch [Send E-Mail]
Date: Sunday, 30-Jun-2013 01:44:26

The last figure I heard was the Congress had borrowed almost 7 TRILLION dollars fron the SSI, will they ever pay it back?
Just a reminder, Better pass this around, it's the clearest presentation I have seen in quite some time.
Social Security check
Friday, April 20, 2013, 5:00 AM
Here we go.
JUST REALIZED THAT WITH REQUIRED AUTO DEPOSIT,
I NEVER GET TO SEE THE CHECK ....
ALERT EVERYONE YOU KNOW.
THIS AFFECTS ALL OF US.*
*Subject:*
SOCIAL SECURITY becomes FEDERAL BENEFIT CHECK
Have you noticed, the Social Security check is now referred to as a "Federal Benefit Payment"?
I'll be part of the one percent to forward this. I am forwarding it because it Touches a nerve in me, and I hope it will in you.
Please keep passing it on until everyone in our country has read it.
The government is now referring to our Social Security checks as
a Federal Benefit Payment.
This isn't a benefit. It is earned income! Not only did we all contribute to Social Security but our employers did too.
It totaled 15% of our income before taxes .
If you averaged $30K per year over your working life, that's close to $180,000 Invested in Social Security .
If you calculate the future value of your monthly investment in social security( $375/month, including both your and your employers contributions) at a meager 1% Interest rate
compounded monthly, after 40 years of working you'd have
more than $1.3+ million dollars saved!
This is your personal investment .
Upon retirement, if you took out only 3% per year , you'd receive $39,318 per year, or $3,277 per month .
That's almost three times more than today's average Social Security benefit of $1,230 per month,according to the Social Security Administration
(Google it - its a fact).
And your retirement fund would last more than 33 years (until you're 98 if you retire at age 65)! I can only imagine how much better most average-income people could live in retirement if our government had just invested our money in low-risk interest-earning accounts .
Instead, the folks in Washington pulled off a bigger Ponzi scheme than Bernie Madoff ever did.
They took our money andused it elsewhere.
They forgot (Knew) that it was OUR money they were taking.
They didn't have a referendum to ask us if we wanted to lend the money to them .
And they didn't pay interest on the debt they assumed .
And recently,they've told us that the money won't support us for very much longer .
But is it our fault they misused our investments?
And now, to add insult to injury, they're calling it a benefit , as if we never worked to earn every penny of it.
Offered by John C.
Just because they borrowed the money,
doesn't mean that our investments were a charity !
Let's take a stand .
We have earned our right to Social Security and Medicare.
Demand that our legislators bring some sense into our government .
Find a way to keep Social Security and Medicare going,
for the sake of that 92% of our population who need it.
*Then call it what it is:
Our Earned Retirement Income.
*99% of people won't forward this.
Will you?
*You can bet I WILL !!!*

RV Intel - Jester Morning Chat - 6-30-13

gizmo] Robertprofessor do you have any doubts that this will happen tonight/tomorrow? I believe Iraq is definitely ready, just worried about the Global Reset which has to happen. Thanks for your input!

[Robertprofessor] .gizmo Hey, there. Stepped away. First, Jester set me straight last night about Forex. We won't see anything from there first. Second, I feel certain that we will get our emails and begin banking this week. Precisely when? I don't have any good guess ...we are past the point of no return though.

[Jester] hi puppylove, peeps, lurkers, and critters... how is everyone this morning? thought i'd pop in before the race and see how it is going...

 [Jester] everyone is napping... lol

 [tenizen] Jester Oh just sitting around on a weekend, waiting for a certain currency to appreciate a few cents.

[tampa---dd] Jester Hi .. Great day for an Okie email

[snowwolfsdee] Jester there is a race? horses? cars? us?, lol

[Jester] snowwolfsdee NASCAR on tnt unless they get rained out again...

[Robertprofessor] Jester Anything to be gained by us today watching Forex?

Jester] Robertprofessor how would you watch it? takes a $100,000 a year screen to see it...

[Robertprofessor] Jester Hahahaha ... then I think I'll go car shopping this afternoon.

bigbear] Jester But Redwolf will be watching it and you will tell us ----right?????

[Jester] bigbear he does not have a trader screen... that is not what he does...

[starbucksrules] Jester Jester The Time Line you outlined a few Days ago, has expired you know!! can you elaborate??

 [Iank1978] Starbucksrule- it has?

 [puppylove] starbucksrules IT WAS A SCENERIO PLEASE RE READ THE POST..

[Jester] starbucksrules if you read it you know it has not...

[Robertprofessor] starbucksrules Is it Monday and I missed it?

starbucksrules] Jester Jester Oh ok! :) I appreciate that! The Translation: we focus on the Forex later today!!

[Iank1978] Jester- there's been a lot of doubt in here today, can you erase that please lol

Jester] Iank1978 well... doubt about what? i know they are working on it... we wanted to see some things happening that haven't happened yet... but hoping for today... and we understand they have schedules for same... just watching the process...

 [Iank1978] Jester- not really me, just want people to keep the faith thanks

[Jester] race is getting ready to start...

  [Jester] an they're off!

[mailboxmoney] Jester have you heard that The Clintons and Bushs are in Africa with O? I read that this morning just wondering if true or not

 [mailboxmoney] i think it came from someone called Jedi

 [paradisegirl] mailboxmoney good morning - just on Fox that the Obamas and Bushes will be in Tanzania at the same time with different events, and another event with Michelle O and Laura B together. No mention of the Clintons

[Jester] mailboxmoney we heard that earlier in the week... and now it is in the news... heard certain people wanted other certain people out of the way while they finish things up... hmmmm...

[mailboxmoney] Jester Lordy Lordy things are getting interesting

[johnnyjunk] Jester dude - I love it when you go "hmmmmmmm" rofl ... class is finally catching up with the teacher ...

[Jester] johnnyjunk hahahaha... you got it...

[jblb] Jester so all certain people being in africa is not an accident

[tampa---dd] Jester Judging from the scenario, I would think that an email tonight is still within the schedule!

[Jester] tampa---dd we are tracking the things that need to get done... will know more later in the day...

[triple777] Jester down at the beach this week for vacation and wanting to finalize purchase of beach house are we still on track as you felt thursday with plausible scenario? I think you will like you suite in middle section overlooking pool and ocean.

 [Jester] triple777 cool... i wish i had time to go to the beach! lol

 [triple777] Jester finish the processing on GCR tomorrow and you'll have all the time in the world

[nolaspice.] Jester what? No time for beach? that's no way to live. Bora bora baby!

[Jester] nolaspice. hahaha.... too much going on right now.. but not for long...

Dinar Breaking Intel News UPDATE

PatriotEmpire;  Breaking Intel News UPDATE: Jedi 1 I just hung up from a Blog Talk Radio (started at 11pm CDT Sat Night) show that I monitor. I’m really excited. Which goes along with the excitement I got 2 hours ago when I read ShawnW’s post.

Now I am getting doublely excited. Jedi 1 (Another Randy, NOT Koonce) just finished his show 11pm CDT (Friday Night) called Global Reset Society and he says his sources and his intel says it is Sunday Night (Monday in Iraq) it likely will happen.

He states that his reasons are:

1. Obama, is in South Africa at a cost to tax payers of $800,000,000 while America is crashing and guess who is joining him and his wife on Monday there….Both Clintons and George Sr and George Jr are meeting our king and Michelle there. The whole Cabal will be there. Why are they all together? Cash in party perhaps?

2. Jedi 1 says CBi site has been up and down for last 24 hours (Testing the new rate notification system?)

 3.Jedi was called to a meeting and just got back tonight from a mastermind meeting and got lots of new intel which I am sharing what he said just 20 mins ago. 

Go HERE to hear this for yourself. The whole show is less than 60 mins:http://www.blogtalkradio.com/jedi1/2013/06/30/and-so-it-begins?utm_source=BTRemail&utm_medium=ShowReminder

OR http://www.blogtalkradio.com/jedi1/2013/06/30/and-so-it-begins

4. This is coming to a focal point right now as on July 1st several things take place

5. The USA has been under a news embargo to get NO real IRAQ intel but his sources cracked a TOP LEADER’S Face Book Page and there was many things discovered including a real video (that was witnessed) saying that Iraq will regain premier status of the IQD very very soon.

6. Chapter 7 is over and that is one of the main things that we were waiting for. It has now happened.

7. Within 24 - 48 hours most countries coming out of a Ch 7 have gone right to a new currency level.

8. NEW QUARTER GLOBALLY starts on MONDAY in Iraq and everywhere else

9. Iran is officially being placed under the most rigid pre approved sanctions on MONDAY, July 1 (NO Accident? Hummmmmm Me wonders)

10. Iraq now has the right to change their currency rate but they would want to open on a brand new quarter globally to do so to simplify the accounting and paper work.

11. Saturday was a banking holiday and they (Iraq banks) will be OPEN on Sunday. Perfect to change the rate as they go into a new global quarter.

Very interesting indeed. I have never heard him as excited as he was tonight. I post this for your intel. Consider this more rumtel until it happens and yes we all will know it within minutes.

Be well tonight. It maybe less than 48 hours away. PatriotEmpire Over and Out for tonight. Wonder if I will ever get to sleep? Feels like Christmas Eve to me. You want some GOOD news? Well there it is.

Excuse my misspellings and my interpretation of what I heard. You can hear it for yourself and bash me with the facts as you heard them! LOL 

No Bank Deposits Will Be Spared from Confiscation...

No Bank Deposits Will Be Spared from Confiscation...
Global Research, April 24, 2013

PLEASE SHOW THIS TO THE JESTER AND THE REST OF THE GUR-FOOLS...
Region: Europe, USA
i challenge anyone to prove me wrong that confiscation of bank deposits is legalized daylight robbery
Bank depositors in the UK and USA may think that their bank deposits would not be confiscated as they are insured and no government would dare embark on such a drastic action to bail out insolvent banks.
Before I explain why confiscation of bank deposits in the UK and US is a certainty and absolutely legal, I need all readers of this article to do the following:
Ask your local police, sheriffs, lawyers, judges the following questions:
1) If I place my money with a lawyer as a stake-holder and he uses the money without my consent, has the lawyer committed a crime?
2) If I store a bushel of wheat or cotton in a warehouse and the owner of the warehouse sold my wheat/cotton without my consent or authority, has the warehouse owner committed a crime?
3) If I place monies with my broker (stock or commodity) and the broker uses my monies for other purposes and or contrary to my instructions, has the broker committed a crime?
I am confident that the answer to the above questions is a Yes!
However, for the purposes of this article, I would like to first highlight the situation of the deposit / storage of wheat with a warehouse owner in relation to the deposit of money / storage with a banker.
First, you will notice that all wheat is the same i.e. the wheat in one bushel is no different from the wheat in another bushel. Likewise with cotton, it is indistinguishable. The deposit of a bushel of wheat with the warehouse owner in law constitutes a bailment. Ownership of the bushel of wheat remains with you and there is no transfer of ownership at all to the warehouse owner.
And as stated above, if the owner sells the bushel of wheat without your consent or authority, he has committed a crime as well as having committed a civil wrong (a tort) of conversion – converting your property to his own use and he can be sued.
Let me use another analogy. If a cashier in a supermarket removes $100 from the till on Friday to have a frolic on Saturday, he has committed theft, even though he may replace the $100 on Monday without the knowledge of the owner / manager of the supermarket. The $100 the cashier stole on Friday is also indistinguishable from the $100 he put back in the till on Monday. In both situations – the wheat in the warehouse and the $100 dollar bill in the till, which have been unlawfully misappropriated would constitute a crime.
Keep this principle and issue at the back of your mind.
Now we shall proceed with the money that you have deposited with your banker.
I am sure that most of you have little or no knowledge about banking, specifically fractional reserve banking.
Since you were a little kid, your parents have encouraged you to save some money to instil in you the good habit of money management.
And when you grew up and got married, you in turn instilled the same discipline in your children. Your faith in the integrity of the bank is almost absolute. Your money in the bank would earn an interest income.
And when you want your money back, all you needed to do is to withdraw the money together with the accumulated interest. Never for a moment did you think that you had transferred ownership of your money to the bank. Your belief was grounded in like manner as the owner of the bushel of wheat stored in the warehouse.
However, this belief is and has always been a lie. You were led to believe this lie because of savvy advertisements by the banks and government assurances that your money is safe and is protected by deposit insurance.
But, the insurance does not cover all the monies that you have deposited in the bank, but to a limited amount e.g. $250,000 in the US by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Germany €100,000, UK £85,000 etc.
But, unlike the owner of the bushel of wheat who has deposited the wheat with the warehouse owner, your ownership of the monies that you have deposited with the bank is transferred to the bank and all you have is the right to demand its repayment. And, if the bank fails to repay your monies (e.g. $100), your only remedy is to sue the bank and if the bank is insolvent you get nothing.
You may recover some of your money if your deposit is covered by an insurance scheme as referred to earlier but in a fixed amount. But, there is a catch here. Most insurance schemes whether backed by the government or not do not have sufficient monies to cover all the deposits in the banking system.
So, in the worst case scenario – a systemic collapse, there is no way for you to get your money back.
In fact, and as illustrated in the Cyprus banking fiasco, the authorities went to the extent of confiscating your deposits to pay the banks' creditors. When that happened, ordinary citizens and financial analysts cried out that such confiscation was daylight robbery. But, is it?
Surprise, surprise!
It will come as a shock to all of you to know that such daylight robbery is perfectly legal and this has been so for hundreds of years.
Let me explain.
The reason is that unlike the owner of the bushel of wheat whose ownership of the wheat WAS NEVER TRANSFERRED to the warehouse owner when the same was deposited, the moment you deposited your money with the bank, the ownership is transferred to the bank.
Your status is that of A CREDITOR TO THE BANK and the BANK IS IN LAW A DEBTOR to you. You are deemed to have "lent" your money to the bank for the bank to apply to its banking business (even to gamble in the biggest casino in the world – the global derivatives casino).
You have become a creditor, AN UNSECURED CREDITOR. Therefore, by law, in the insolvency of a bank, you as an unsecured creditor stand last in the queue of creditors to be paid out of any funds and or assets which the bank has to pay its creditors. The secured creditors are always first in line to be paid. It is only after secured creditors have been paid and there are still some funds left (usually, not much, more often zilch!) that unsecured creditors are paid and the sums pro-rated among all the unsecured creditors.
This is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
The law has been in existence for hundreds of years and was established in England by the House of Lords in the case Foley v Hill in 1848.
When a customer deposits money with his banker, the relationship that arises is one of creditor and debtor, with the banker liable to repay the money deposited when demanded by the customer. Once money has been paid to the banker, it belongs to the banker and he is free to use the money for his own purpose.
I will now quote the relevant portion of the judgment of the House of Lords handed down by Lord Cottenham, the Lord Chancellor. He stated thus:
"Money when paid into a bank, ceases altogether to be the money of the principal… it is then the money of the banker, who is bound to return an equivalent by paying a similar sum to that deposited with him when he is asked for it.
The money paid into the banker's, is money known by the principal to be placed there for the purpose of being under the control of the banker; it is then the banker's money; he is known to deal with it as his own; he makes what profit of it he can, which profit he retains himself,…
The money placed in the custody of the banker is, to all intent and purposes, the money of the banker, to do with it as he pleases; he is guilty of no breach of trust in employing it; he is not answerable TO THE PRINCIPAL IF HE PUTS IT INTO JEOPARDY, IF HE ENGAGES IN A HAZARDOUS SPECULATION; he is not bound to keep it or deal with it as the property of the principal, but he is of course answerable for the amount, because he has contracted, having received that money, to repay to the principal, when demanded, a sum equivalent to that paid into his hands." (quoted in UK Law Essays, Relationship Between A Banker And Customer,That Of A Creditor/Debtor, emphasis added,)
Holding that the relationship between a banker and his customer was one of debtor and creditor and not one of trusteeship, Lord Brougham said:
"This trade of a banker is to receive money, and use it as if it were his own, he becoming debtor to the person who has lent or deposited with him the money to use as his own, and for which money he is accountable as a debtor. I cannot at all confound the situation of a banker with that of a trustee, and conclude that the banker is a debtor with a fiduciary character."
In plain simple English – bankers cannot be prosecuted for breach of trust, because it owes no fiduciary duty to the depositor / customer, as he is deemed to be using his own money to speculate etc. There is absolutely no criminal liability.
The trillion dollar question is, Why has no one in the Justice Department or other government agencies mentioned this legal principle?
The reason why no one dare speak this legal truth is because there would be a run on the banks when all the Joe Six-Packs wise up to the fact that their deposits with the bankers CONSTITUTE IN LAW A LOAN TO THE BANK and the bank can do whatever it likes even to indulge in hazardous speculation such as gambling in the global derivative casino.
The Joe Six-Packs always consider the bank the creditor even when he deposits money in the bank. No depositor ever considers himself as the creditor!
Yes, Eric Holder, the US Attorney-General is right when he said that bankers cannot be prosecuted for the losses suffered by the bank. This is because a banker cannot be prosecuted for losing his "own money" as stated by the House of Lords. This is because when money is deposited with the bank, that money belongs to the banker.
The reason that if a banker is prosecuted it would collapse the entire banking system is a big lie.
The US Attorney-General could not and would not state the legal principle because it would cause a run on the banks when people discover that their monies are not safe with bankers as they can in law use the monies deposited as their own even to speculate.
What is worrisome is that your right to be repaid arises only when you demand payment.
Obviously, when you demand payment, the bank must pay you. But, if you demand payment after the bank has collapsed and is insolvent, it is too late. Your entitlement to be repaid is that of a lonely unsecured creditor and only if there are funds left after liquidation to be paid out to all the unsecured creditors and the remaining funds to be pro-rated. You would be lucky to get ten cents on the dollar.
So, when the Bank of England, the FED and the BIS issued the guidelines which became the template for the Cyprus "bail-in" (which was endorsed by the G-20 Cannes Summit in 2011), it was merely a circuitous way of stating the legal position without arousing the wrath of the people, as they well knew that if the truth was out, there would be a revolution and blood on the streets. It is therefore not surprising that the global central bankers came out with this nonsensical advisory:
"The objective of an effective resolution regime is to make feasible the resolution of financial institutions without severe systemic disruption and without exposing taxpayers to losses, while protecting vital economic functions through mechanisms which make it possible for shareholders and unsecured and uninsured creditors to absorb losses in a manner that respects the hierarchy of claims in liquidation."(quoted in FSB Consultative Document: Effective Resolution of Systemically …)
This is the kind of complex technical jargon used by bankers to confuse the people, especially depositors and to cover up what I have stated in plain and simple English in the foregoing paragraphs.
The key words of the BIS guideline are:
"without severe systemic disruptions" (i.e. bank runs),
"while protecting vital economic functions" (i.e. protecting vested interests – bankers),
"unsecured creditors" (i.e. your monies, you are the dummy),
"respects the hierarchy of claims in liquidation" (i.e. you are last in the queue to be paid, after all secured creditors have been paid).
This means all depositors are losers!
I Please read this article carefully and spread it far and wide.
You will be doing a favour to all your fellow co omen and more importantly, your family and relatives.

IF YOU NEED SOME TIME TO  MAKE A DECISION PUT YOUR DOUGH IN A COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION, AS THEY ARE ON A DIFFERENT SYSTEM. DO NOT PUT IT IN BANKS OR FEDERAL CREDIT UNIONS .... THEY ARE ON THE SAME SYSTEM.

Emergency email about global financial collapse

Emergency email about global financial collapse

I don't normally send email like this on Sunday but this one is critical.

You need to read the articles at the links here, and then watch the silver market very closely when it opens on Monday. 

When you realize what is going on in the silver market after you read these articles, then don't just sit there.
Do something about it to protect yourself. 




Emergency email

Stunning Indian Buying To Crush Silver Shorts


YOU CAN TAKE THIS FOR WHAT YOU THINK ITS WORTH! BUT FROM WHAT I'VE SEEN BY OUR PROGRESSIVE GOVERNMENT AND WHAT THEY HAVE DONE OR HELPED TO DO IN OTHER COUNTRIES I WOULD GET MY SAVINGS OUT OF THE BANKS AND OTHER MONEY ACCOUNTS FOR AWHILE SO I WOULD'NT LET THE OUT OF CONTROL GOVERNMENT GET THEIR HANDS ON IT AS THEY WILL NOT GIVE IT BACK! YOU CAN ALWAYS PUT IT BACK WHEN THINGS ARE MORE STABLE.

----- Forwarded Message -----
Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2013 10:39 PM
Subject: Basell III vote on July 2nd. Deriviatives will implode

Complete currency collapse in progress right now!

Quadrillions In Derivatives Is Ready To Blow Up A Magnitude Bigger Than What Happened To AIG. They Are Rate Sensitive. Every Tick Up Brings Us Closer To A Massive Event!

READ MORE AT:  
-----------------------------------------
Paul Stramer

SLC Distributing, P.O. Box 116, 3030 Sophie Lake Road, Eureka, MT 59917, USA

Unsubscribe | Change Subscriber Options

Washington Is Driving The World To The Final War

Subject: News Roundup - June 30th


News Roundup - June 30th


Washington Is Driving The World To The Final War

Paul Craig Roberts
June 29, 2013
Institute for Political Economy

“V For Vendetta,” a film that portrays evil in a futuristic England as a proxy for the evil that exists today in America, ends with the defeat of evil. But this is a movie in which the hero has super powers. If you have not seen this film, you should watch it. It might wake you up and give you courage. The excerpts below show that, at least among some filmmakers, the desire for liberty still exists.

Whether the desire for liberty exists in America remains to be seen. If Americans can overcome their gullibility, their lifelong brainwashing, their propensity to believe every lie that “their” government tells them, and if Americans can escape the Matrix in which they live, they can reestablish the morality, justice, peace, freedom, and liberty that “their” government has taken from them. It is not impossible for Americans to again stand with uplifted heads. They only have to recognize that “their” government is the enemy of truth, justice, human rights and life itself.

Can mere ordinary Americans triumph over the evil that is “their” government without the aid of a superhero? If ideas are strong enough and Americans can comprehend them, good can prevail over the evil that is concentrated in Washington. What stands between the American people and their comprehension of evil is their gullibility.

If good fails in its battle with Washington’s evil, our future is a boot stamping on the human face forever.

If you, an American, living in superpower America lack the courage to stand up to the evil that is “your” government, perhaps the courage of Edward Snowden, Bradley Manning, Julian Assange, and tiny Ecuador will give you heart.

A US senator from New Jersey, Robert Menendez, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told the Ecuadoran government that he would block the import of vegetables and flowers from Ecuador if Ecuador gives asylum to Edward Snowden. The cost to Ecuador would be one billion dollars in lost revenues.

Menendez’s statement–”Our government will not reward countries for bad behavior”–is ironic. It equates bad behavior with protecting a truth-teller and good behavior with betraying a truth-teller. Menendez’s statement is also a lie. The US government only rewards bad behavior. The US government consistently rewards those who conspire against the elected governments of their own countries, setting them up as dictators when Washington overthrows the elected governments.

Menendez’s threat did not work, but the senator did succeed in delivering yet another humiliating blow to Washington’s prestige. The Ecuadoran President, Rafael Correa, beat Menendez to the punch and cancelled the trade pact with the US on the grounds that the pact was a threat to the sovereignty of Ecuador and to moral principles and was being used by Washington to blackmail Ecuador. “Ecuador doesn’t accept pressure or threats from anyone,” added Communications Secretary Fernando Alvarado who then offered Washington foreign aid to provide human rights training to combat torture, illegal executions and attacks on peoples’ privacy.....

.....American patriots, who feel that they should be on “their” government’s side regardless of the facts, would do well to remember what true patriotism is. For Americans, patriotism has always meant allegiance to the Constitution, not to the government. The oath is to defend the Constitution against enemies domestic and foreign. The Bush and Obama regimes have proven themselves to be the Constitution’s worst enemies. It is not possible for a true patriot to support a government that destroys the Constitution. The United States is the Constitution. Our country is not the Obama regime, the Bush regime, or some other administration. Our country is the Constitution. The Constitution is our country.

Beyond obligations to one’s own country, all humans have a responsibility to human life itself. Washington’s puppet states, such as the NATO countries, Japan, and Colombia, by providing cover and support for Washington’s aggression are enabling Washington to drive the world into World War III.

The temptation of Washington’s money easily overwhelms weak characters such as Tony Blair and David Cameron. But the governments of NATO countries and other accommodating states are not only selling out their own peoples by supporting Washington’s wars of aggression, they are selling out humanity. Washington’s hubris and arrogance grow as Washington bumps off country after country. Sooner or later Russia and China, will realize that they themselves are targets and will draw firmer lines. Arrogance will prevent Washington from acknowledging the lines, and the final war will be launched.

Washington’s hegemonic impulse is driving the world to destruction. The peoples of the world should realize this and force their governments to stop enabling Washington’s aggression.

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2013/06/28/washington-is-driving-the-world-to-the-final-war-paul-craig-roberts/

****************************
Edward Snowden's plan to seek sanctuary in Ecuador is falling apart

As whistle-blower waits in limbo, Ecuadorean frustration at the 'grandstanding' of ally Julian Assange has put in doubt his quest for asylum

Sunday, 30 June, 2013
The Guardian in New York

Julian Assange was reported to have apologised to Ecuador for causing "discomfort in the Snowden matter"

The plan to spirit whistle-blower Edward Snowden to sanctuary in Latin America appears to be falling apart amid tension between Ecuador's government and WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

President Rafael Correa halted a bid to help Snowden leave Russia amid concerns Assange was usurping the role of the Ecuadorean government, according to leaked diplomatic correspondence.

He declared invalid a temporary travel document which could have helped extract Snowden from his reported location in Moscow.

Correa declared that the safe conduct pass issued by Ecuador's London consul - in collaboration with Assange - was unauthorised. Other Ecuadorean diplomats privately said the WikiLeaks founder could be perceived as "running the show".

Yesterday Correa said he had spoken with US Vice-President Joe Biden about Snowden, and that Biden had asked Ecuador to reject the fugitive intelligence leaker's asylum request.

Correa said the conversation took place on Friday and that Biden "passed on a polite request from the United States to reject the request".

According to the leaked diplomatic correspondence, obtained by the broadcaster Univision and shared with The Wall Street Journal, divisions over Assange have annoyed Ecuador's government.

The country's ambassador to the US, Nathalie Cely, told presidential spokesman Fernando Alvarado that Ecuador's role in the drama was being overshadowed by the WikiLeaks founder, who has sheltered in Ecuador's London embassy for the past year to avoid extradition.

"I suggest talking to Assange to better control the communications. From outside, [Assange] appears to be running the show."

Earlier last week, a senior foreign diplomat in the capital, Quito, told The Guardian that some - though not all - factions in the government were annoyed with what they saw as Assange's "grandstanding".

In a message attributed to Assange sent to Ecuador's foreign minister, Ricardo Patino, and top officials, the WikiLeaks founder apologised "if we have unwittingly [caused] Ecuador discomfort in the Snowden matter".

The note continued: "There is a fog of war due to the rapid nature of events. If similar events arise, you can be assured that they do not originate in any lack of respect or concern for Ecuador or its government."

Assange appears to have had a strong role in obtaining the travel document for Snowden, dated June 22. It bore the printed name, but not the signature, of the London consul, Fidel Narvaez, a confidante. By mid-week Narvaez was reportedly in Moscow.

The document could have helped Snowden, whose US passport has been revoked, leave the transit lounge of Moscow's Sheremetyevo airport, where he has reportedly holed up since fleeing Hong Kong last weekend.

On Thursday, Correa - who has previously hailed Snowden for exposing US spying and has earned kudos for defying Washington pressure over the affair - appeared to belittle Snowden's chances of making it to Quito.

Declaring the travel document invalid at a press conference, he said Ecuador would not consider an asylum request unless Snowden reached Ecuadorean territory.

"The situation of Mr Snowden is a complex situation and we don't know how he will solve it," Correa said.

But he ramped up defiance of the US by waiving preferential trade rights to thwart what officials called Washington "blackmail". Analysts said Correa had skilfully extracted political capital from the saga without drawing US retaliation.

http://www.scmp.com/news/world/article/1272029/edward-snowdens-plan-seek-sanctuary-ecuador-falling-apart

******************************
Rep. Justin Amash: NSA Has A Damaging Affect On Our Culture

June 30, 2013
Liberty Crier

Congressman Justin Amash explains why the NSA PRISM spy program is wrong and in direct contradiction to the principles of a free society.
video:

http://libertycrier.com/u-s-constitution/justin-amash-nsa-has-a-damaging-affect-on-our-culture/?utm_source=The+Liberty+Crier&utm_campaign=1247d33fce-The_Liberty_Crier_Daily_News_6_30_2013&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_600843dec4-1247d33fce-284711157

*****************************
We Are (Still) Winning (video)

Posted by Corbett
June 30, 2013

Amidst the doom, gloom and paranoia of the daily headlines, it is all too easy to lose sight of the big picture: that we are transforming the society around us, and we have already had an incredible effect in waking people up and raising awareness of the real issues. Today on The Corbett Report we take a moment out of covering the bad news to appreciate the progress we’ve made and anticipate the progress yet to come.

Video: http://www.corbettreport.com/we-are-still-winning-video/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+CorbettReportRSS+%28The+Corbett+Report%29&utm_content=Yahoo!+Mail


"The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in times of great
moral crises maintain their neutrality" -Dante Alighieri

They who watch while our elected officials are ravaging our country
should consider that...Vin

Join The Fight - Expose Globalism and The New World Order

Can your automobile be remotely hacked? Part II

In my further research, I noticed this Gizmag article http://www.gizmag.com/vehicle-computer-systems-hacks/15156/. Apparently, the vulnerability of modern vehicle on-board computer to hacking has been well known for some times. In the experiments conducted by the joint research team of University of Washington and University of California San Diego, the researchers uploaded malicious instructions/codes through physical connection to the vehicle diagnostic port. But in reality, it is technically possible to plug a transceiver device onto the input ports, such as the vehicle diagnostic port, and then inject the external instructions/codes through the ubiquitous wireless netowork into the on-board computer. It is similar to a USB Wi-Fi adapter plugged into the USB of your home computer, which relays data between the remote Wi-Fi access point and your computer.

Such vehicle on-board computer wireless communication adapter, if you will, would allow data to be sent to  remote receivers and at the same time instructions to be received from remote devices.Now the question is what kind of security mechanism has been implemented in the on-board vehicle computer systems, or specifically whether the security protocol allows the instructions/codes issued by the remote devices to disrupt the normal operating process of the vehicle, or even to override the manual command, such as pressed brake-pedal.

We know that, in the vehicle Cruise Control system, manually applying the pressure on brake-pedal should override the previously established cruising speed settings. That is what most people would think vehicle on-board system should work: the driver's manual inputs should supersede all other forms of instructions in the system.

If Machael Hastings' car was indeed remotely hacked so that he had no control of his vehicle at all shortly before it crashed. then we need to start to pay attention to the security of on-board vehicle computer system. We need to ask the car manufacturers the following questions:

(1) In designing the vehicle on-board computer system, what kind of security features/protocols have they put into place to prevent external hacking attempt?

(2) Can an external device attached to the computer system, such as a GPS tracking device, both read and write data to and from the computer system? What kind of restrictions are put into place to limit its access to READ only? ( In my earlier story, the suspected GPS tracker presumably read data from the Transmission Control Unit (TCU) in order to identify whether I shifted the gear from "P" to "D" and "D" to "P". I did not see any sign that the tracker could WRITE to the TCU or other part of the system, but I could not rule it out.)

(3) On some critical operations such as braking, etc., does the action of the driver, i.e. manual input, override all other type of computer instructions/codes, as it should, or are there higher privileged users, such as Superuser, etc., who would be able to override even the manual operations conducted by the car drivers?

I urge you, especially those who are journalists, to investigate this matter further so that the general public could be made aware of this risk. We need to be informed what the car manufacturers have done to counter the increasing risk.
Thank you,
JitL